197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18757168)
1. In vivo wear rate of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty. A review of 10 retrieved components.
Witzleb WC; Hanisch U; Ziegler J; Guenther KP
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):951-6. PubMed ID: 18757168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of explanted Articular Surface Replacement and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing components.
Underwood R; Matthies A; Cann P; Skinner JA; Hart AJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Sep; 93(9):1169-77. PubMed ID: 21911526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrieval analysis of 240 metal-on-metal hip components, comparing modular total hip replacement with hip resurfacing.
Matthies A; Underwood R; Cann P; Ilo K; Nawaz Z; Skinner J; Hart AJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Mar; 93(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 21357950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wear and acetabular component orientation in third generation alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings: an analysis of 33 retrievals [corrected].
Lusty PJ; Watson A; Tuke MA; Walter WL; Walter WK; Zicat B
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Sep; 89(9):1158-64. PubMed ID: 17905951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear.
Langton DJ; Joyce TJ; Jameson SS; Lord J; Van Orsouw M; Holland JP; Nargol AV; De Smet KA
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 21282753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of retrieved acetabular components of three polyethylene types.
Salineros MJ; Crowninshield RD; Laurent M; Wimmer MA; Jacobs JJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():140-9. PubMed ID: 17632415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can component and patient factors account for the variance in wear rates among bilateral total hip arthroplasty patients?
Orishimo KF; Sychterz CJ; Hopper RH; Engh CA
J Arthroplasty; 2003 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 12629604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surface oxidized zirconium total hip arthroplasty head damage due to closed reduction effects on polyethylene wear.
Jaffe WL; Strauss EJ; Cardinale M; Herrera L; Kummer FJ
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 18848427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polyethylene sterilization and production affects wear in total hip arthroplasties.
Faris PM; Ritter MA; Pierce AL; Davis KE; Faris GW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():305-8. PubMed ID: 16906113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Wear analysis of 39 conserve plus metal-on-metal hip resurfacing retrievals.
Takamura KM; Amstutz HC; Lu Z; Campbell PA; Ebramzadeh E
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Feb; 29(2):410-5. PubMed ID: 23845764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does neck/liner impingement increase wear of ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene liners?
Usrey MM; Noble PC; Rudner LJ; Conditt MA; Birman MV; Santore RF; Mathis KB
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):65-71. PubMed ID: 16950064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wear in alumina-on-alumina ceramic total hip replacements: a retrieval analysis of edge loading.
Esposito CI; Walter WL; Roques A; Tuke MA; Zicat BA; Walsh WR; Walter WK
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jul; 94(7):901-7. PubMed ID: 22733943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Birmingham hip resurfacing: is acetabular bone conserved?
Moonot P; Singh PJ; Cronin MD; Kalairajah YE; Kavanagh TG; Field RE
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Mar; 90(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 18310753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Polyethylene wear against alumina and zirconia heads in cemented total hip arthroplasty.
Liang B; Kawanabe K; Ise K; Iida H; Nakamura T
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Feb; 22(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 17275643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimal backside surface changes observed in retrieved acetabular liners.
Akbari A; Roy ME; Whiteside LA; Katerberg BJ; Schnettgoecke DJ
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Aug; 26(5):686-92. PubMed ID: 20875939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional surface deviation maps for analysis of retrieved polyethylene acetabular liners using micro-computed tomography.
Teeter MG; Naudie DD; Charron KD; Holdsworth DW
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Feb; 25(2):330-2. PubMed ID: 20022448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-term wear of Japanese highly cross-linked polyethylene in cementless THA.
Miyanishi K; Hara T; Kaminomachi S; Maekawa M; Iwamoto M; Torisu T
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Sep; 128(9):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18175133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Method for the location of primary wear scars from retrieved metal on metal hip replacements.
Govind G; Henckel J; Hothi H; Sabah S; Skinner J; Hart A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Jul; 16():173. PubMed ID: 26223255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of storage time on the wear rates of ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene acetabular liners in hip simulators.
Weimin F; Huanghe S; Xiang L; Feng L; Qing W
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 18534409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of a retrieved UHMWPE acetabular cup crosslinked in air with 1000 kGy of gamma radiation.
Sugano N; Saito M; Yamamoto T; Nishii T; Yau SS; Wang A
J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul; 22(4):828-31. PubMed ID: 15183441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
