BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18757328)

  • 1. Cost effectiveness of intraperitoneal compared with intravenous chemotherapy for women with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
    Havrilesky LJ; Secord AA; Darcy KM; Armstrong DK; Kulasingam S;
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Sep; 26(25):4144-50. PubMed ID: 18757328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel versus intravenous carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy for Stage III ovarian cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Bristow RE; Santillan A; Salani R; Diaz-Montes TP; Giuntoli RL; Meisner BC; Armstrong DK; Frick KD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Sep; 106(3):476-81. PubMed ID: 17688927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized Trial of Intravenous Versus Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab in Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.
    Walker JL; Brady MF; Wenzel L; Fleming GF; Huang HQ; DiSilvestro PA; Fujiwara K; Alberts DS; Zheng W; Tewari KS; Cohn DE; Powell MA; Van Le L; Davidson SA; Gray HJ; Rose PG; Aghajanian C; Myers T; Alvarez Secord A; Rubin SC; Mannel RS
    J Clin Oncol; 2019 Jun; 37(16):1380-1390. PubMed ID: 31002578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phase III trial of standard-dose intravenous cisplatin plus paclitaxel versus moderately high-dose carboplatin followed by intravenous paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in small-volume stage III ovarian carcinoma: an intergroup study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, Southwestern Oncology Group, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
    Markman M; Bundy BN; Alberts DS; Fowler JM; Clark-Pearson DL; Carson LF; Wadler S; Sickel J
    J Clin Oncol; 2001 Feb; 19(4):1001-7. PubMed ID: 11181662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Health-related quality of life during and after intraperitoneal versus intravenous chemotherapy for optimally debulked ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.
    Wenzel LB; Huang HQ; Armstrong DK; Walker JL; Cella D;
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Feb; 25(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 17264340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Progression-free and overall survival of a modified outpatient regimen of primary intravenous/intraperitoneal paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.
    Barlin JN; Dao F; Bou Zgheib N; Ferguson SE; Sabbatini PJ; Hensley ML; Bell-McGuinn KM; Konner J; Tew WP; Aghajanian C; Chi DS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 125(3):621-4. PubMed ID: 22446622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phase I feasibility study of intraperitoneal cisplatin and intravenous paclitaxel followed by intraperitoneal paclitaxel in untreated ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study.
    Dizon DS; Sill MW; Gould N; Rubin SC; Yamada SD; Debernardo RL; Mannel RS; Eisenhauer EL; Duska LR; Fracasso PM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Nov; 123(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 21820161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy for women with optimally debulked ovarian cancer: results from an intergroup phase II trial.
    Rothenberg ML; Liu PY; Braly PS; Wilczynski SP; Hannigan EV; Wadler S; Stuart G; Jiang C; Markman M; Alberts DS
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Apr; 21(7):1313-9. PubMed ID: 12663720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. BRCA1 expression and improved survival in ovarian cancer patients treated with intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.
    Lesnock JL; Darcy KM; Tian C; Deloia JA; Thrall MM; Zahn C; Armstrong DK; Birrer MJ; Krivak TC
    Br J Cancer; 2013 Apr; 108(6):1231-7. PubMed ID: 23462720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Paclitaxel: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the treatment of ovarian cancer.
    Young M; Plosker GL
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2001; 19(12):1227-59. PubMed ID: 11772158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Main C; Bojke L; Griffin S; Norman G; Barbieri M; Mather L; Stark D; Palmer S; Riemsma R
    Health Technol Assess; 2006 Mar; 10(9):1-132. iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16545208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the toxicity and tolerability of two intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimens for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Bouchard-Fortier G; Rosen B; Vyarvelska I; Pasetka M; Covens A; Gien LT; Kupets R; Pulman K; Ferguson SE; Vicus D
    Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jan; 140(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 26546964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alternative intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimens for optimally debulked ovarian cancer.
    Gray HJ; Shah CA; Swensen RE; Tamimi HK; Goff BA
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 19922987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. At what cost does a potential survival advantage of bevacizumab make sense for the primary treatment of ovarian cancer? A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Cohn DE; Kim KH; Resnick KE; O'Malley DM; Straughn JM
    J Clin Oncol; 2011 Apr; 29(10):1247-51. PubMed ID: 21383297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for first-line treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Lawrie TA; Rabbie R; Thoma C; Morrison J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Oct; 2013(10):CD010482. PubMed ID: 24142521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost effectiveness of first-line pemetrexed plus platinum compared with other regimens in the treatment of patients with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer in the US outpatient setting.
    Shah M; Winfree KB; Peterson P; Gruschkus SK; Eaddy M; Green MR
    Lung Cancer; 2013 Oct; 82(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 23973203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cost-utility analysis of NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Protocol 218: incorporating prospectively collected quality-of-life scores in an economic model of treatment of ovarian cancer.
    Cohn DE; Barnett JC; Wenzel L; Monk BJ; Burger RA; Straughn JM; Myers ER; Havrilesky LJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Feb; 136(2):293-9. PubMed ID: 25449568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness analysis of dose-dense versus standard intravenous chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: An economic analysis of results from the Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 262 randomized controlled trial.
    Seagle BL; Shahabi S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 145(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 28196674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study of serum CA-125 levels in patients with stage III optimally debulked ovarian cancer treated with intraperitoneal compared to intravenous chemotherapy: an analysis of patients enrolled in GOG 172.
    Krivak TC; Tian C; Rose GS; Armstrong DK; Maxwell GL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Oct; 115(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 19596139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of combination versus sequential docetaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer.
    Havrilesky LJ; Pokrzywinski R; Revicki D; Higgins RV; Nycum LR; Kohler MF; Berchuck A; Myers ER; Secord AA
    Cancer; 2012 Jan; 118(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 21598242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.