BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18757624)

  • 1. Challenges of informed choice in organised screening.
    Østerlie W; Solbjør M; Skolbekken JA; Hofvind S; Saetnan AR; Forsmo S
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Sep; 34(9):e5. PubMed ID: 18757624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Informed choice requires information about both benefits and harms.
    Jørgensen KJ; Brodersen J; Hartling OJ; Nielsen M; Gøtzsche PC
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Apr; 35(4):268-9. PubMed ID: 19332586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. To nudge or not to nudge: cancer screening programmes and the limits of libertarian paternalism.
    Ploug T; Holm S; Brodersen J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2012 Dec; 66(12):1193-6. PubMed ID: 22766778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Reder M; Kolip P
    BMC Womens Health; 2015 Jul; 15():53. PubMed ID: 26198675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
    Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reconciling population benefits and women's individual autonomy in mammographic screening: in-depth interviews to explore women's views about 'informed choice'.
    Davey C; White V; Gattellari M; Ward JE
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2005 Feb; 29(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 15782876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women's decision making: The InforMa randomised controlled trial.
    Pérez-Lacasta MJ; Martínez-Alonso M; Garcia M; Sala M; Perestelo-Pérez L; Vidal C; Codern-Bové N; Feijoo-Cid M; Toledo-Chávarri A; Cardona À; Pons A; Carles-Lavila M; Rue M;
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214057. PubMed ID: 30913217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preconceptions influence women's perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative study.
    Henriksen MJ; Guassora AD; Brodersen J
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():404. PubMed ID: 26336075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 'I just want to be able to make a choice': Results from citizen deliberations about mammography screening in Ontario, Canada.
    Abelson J; Tripp L; Sussman J
    Health Policy; 2018 Dec; 122(12):1364-1371. PubMed ID: 30297301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A pilot project with mammography--results from the first screening round].
    Wang H; Hofvind SS; Thoresen SØ
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Nov; 120(27):3237-40. PubMed ID: 11187160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography screening. Benefits, harms, and informed choice.
    Jørgensen KJ
    Dan Med J; 2013 Apr; 60(4):B4614. PubMed ID: 23651722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Personalised informed choice on evidence and controversy on mammography screening: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Roberto A; Colombo C; Candiani G; Giordano L; Mantellini P; Paci E; Satolli R; Valenza M; Mosconi P
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Jun; 17(1):429. PubMed ID: 28629329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Reder M; Kolip P
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189148. PubMed ID: 29236722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol.
    Berens EM; Reder M; Kolip P; Spallek J
    BMJ Open; 2014 Sep; 4(9):e006145. PubMed ID: 25231495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Incidence of breast cancer before and after implementation of mammography screening].
    Hofvind S; Sørum R; Haldorsen T; Langmark F
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Nov; 126(22):2935-8. PubMed ID: 17117191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The state of the organised mammography screening in Hungary in 2006].
    Kovács A; Döbrossy L; Budai A; Boncz I; Cornides A
    Orv Hetil; 2007 May; 148(19):879-85. PubMed ID: 17478403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammography activity in Norway 1983 to 2008.
    Lynge E; Braaten T; Njor SH; Olsen AH; Kumle M; Waaseth M; Lund E
    Acta Oncol; 2011 Oct; 50(7):1062-7. PubMed ID: 21830995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do women make an informed choice about participating in breast cancer screening? A survey among women invited for a first mammography screening examination.
    van Agt H; Fracheboud J; van der Steen A; de Koning H
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Nov; 89(2):353-9. PubMed ID: 22963769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Who gets screened, and where: a comparison of organised and opportunistic mammography screening in Geneva, Switzerland.
    Chamot E; Charvet AI; Perneger TV
    Eur J Cancer; 2007 Feb; 43(3):576-84. PubMed ID: 17223542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.