4579 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18757664)
21. Research papers submitted to Australian Family Physician - types and timelines.
Green R; Del Mar C
Aust Fam Physician; 2006 May; 35(5):362-4. PubMed ID: 16680221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Blinded vs. unblinded peer review of manuscripts submitted to a dermatology journal: a randomized multi-rater study.
Alam M; Kim NA; Havey J; Rademaker A; Ratner D; Tregre B; West DP; Coleman WP
Br J Dermatol; 2011 Sep; 165(3):563-7. PubMed ID: 21623749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators.
Justice AC; Cho MK; Winker MA; Berlin JA; Rennie D
JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 9676668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction.
Weber EJ; Katz PP; Waeckerle JF; Callaham ML
JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2790-3. PubMed ID: 12038913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
Morton JP
Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process.
Earnshaw JJ; Farndon JR; Guillou PJ; Johnson CD; Murie JA; Murray GD
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2000 Apr; 82(4 Suppl):133-5. PubMed ID: 10889776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Peer review in the Croatian Medical Journal from 1992 to 1996.
Marusić A; Mestrović T; Petrovecki M; Marusić M
Croat Med J; 1998 Mar; 39(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 9475799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Peer reviewer training and editor support: results from an international survey of nursing peer reviewers.
Freda MC; Kearney MH; Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty M
J Prof Nurs; 2009; 25(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 19306833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of authors publishing in two groups of U.S. medical journals.
Weller AC
Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1996 Jul; 84(3):359-66. PubMed ID: 8883984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Authorship in manuscripts published in biomedical journals].
Reyes H; Kauffmann R; Andresen M
Rev Med Chil; 2000 Apr; 128(4):363-6. PubMed ID: 10962852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prevalence of honorary coauthorship in the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Bonekamp S; Halappa VG; Corona-Villalobos CP; Mensa M; Eng J; Lewin JS; Kamel IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jun; 198(6):1247-55. PubMed ID: 22623536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Development of a case report review instrument.
Ramulu VG; Levine RB; Hebert RS; Wright SM
Int J Clin Pract; 2005 Apr; 59(4):457-61. PubMed ID: 15853865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quality assessment of reviewers' reports using a simple instrument.
Landkroon AP; Euser AM; Veeken H; Hart W; Overbeke AJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Oct; 108(4):979-85. PubMed ID: 17012462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Authors' and editors' perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals.
Shattell MM; Chinn P; Thomas SP; Cowling WR
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2010 Mar; 42(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 20487187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research.
Henly SJ; Dougherty MC
Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19150263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Peer review at the American Journal of Roentgenology: how reviewer and manuscript characteristics affected editorial decisions on 196 major papers.
Kliewer MA; DeLong DM; Freed K; Jenkins CB; Paulson EK; Provenzale JM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):1545-50. PubMed ID: 15547189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal.
Snell L; Spencer J
Med Educ; 2005 Jan; 39(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 15612905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Problems faced by editors of peer reviewed medical journals.
Jawaid SA
Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S21-5. PubMed ID: 14968187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. How a submitted manuscript is processed.
Peh WC; Ng KH
Singapore Med J; 2009 Sep; 50(9):853-5; quiz 856. PubMed ID: 19787169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Preserving blind peer review of electronic manuscript files.
Jacobson AF; Schmidt K; Coeling H
Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(1):1-4, 7. PubMed ID: 15739759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
