171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18757951)
1. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up.
Heilpern GN; Shah NN; Fordyce MJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1137-42. PubMed ID: 18757951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing.
Pollard TC; Baker RP; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 16645103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series.
Steffen RT; Pandit HP; Palan J; Beard DJ; Gundle R; McLardy-Smith P; Murray DW; Gill HS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Apr; 90(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 18378915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The early outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent Thai surgeon experiences.
Larbpaiboonpong V; Turajane T; Pragtong P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S134-40. PubMed ID: 20120675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre.
Coulter G; Young DA; Dalziel RE; Shimmin AJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Mar; 94(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 22371536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in patients aged < 50 years up to 14 years post-operatively.
Matharu GS; McBryde CW; Pynsent WB; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB
Bone Joint J; 2013 Sep; 95-B(9):1172-7. PubMed ID: 23997127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing dysplasia component in severe acetabular insufficiency: a six- to 9.6-year follow-up.
McMinn DJ; Daniel J; Ziaee H; Pradhan C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Jun; 90(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 18539663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 140 consecutive hips with a minimum five year follow-up. A clinical, radiological and histological analysis.
Giannini S; Cadossi M; Chiarello E; Faldini C; Moroni A; Romagnoli M
Hip Int; 2011; 21(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 21279970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 10 years: results from an independent centre.
Moroni A; Miscione MT; Orsini R; Micera G; Mosca S; Sinapi F; De Girolamo L; Banfi G
Hip Int; 2017 Mar; 27(2):134-139. PubMed ID: 28362050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum follow-up of ten years.
Treacy RB; McBryde CW; Shears E; Pynsent PB
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jan; 93(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21196539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ten-year clinical, radiological and metal ion analysis of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: from a single, non-designer surgeon.
Holland JP; Langton DJ; Hashmi M
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Apr; 94(4):471-6. PubMed ID: 22434461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term survivorship analysis of the cementless Spotorno femoral component in patients less than 50 years of age.
Biemond JE; Pakvis DF; van Hellemondt GG; Buma P
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Apr; 26(3):386-90. PubMed ID: 20299184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips.
Hing CB; Back DL; Bailey M; Young DA; Dalziel RE; Shimmin AJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Nov; 89(11):1431-8. PubMed ID: 17998177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series.
Daniel J; Pradhan C; Ziaee H; Pynsent PB; McMinn DJ
Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1298-306. PubMed ID: 25274912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.
Azam MQ; McMahon S; Hawdon G; Sankineani SR
Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25820838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients.
Baker RP; Pollard TC; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21282752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty at a non-specialist centre.
Patel NK; Wright J; Sabharwal S; Afsharpad A; Bajekal R
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2014 Jan; 96(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 24417834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and clinical outcomes of preoperative evaluations in modern total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Larbpaiboonpong V; Turajane T; Sisayanarane T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S120-7. PubMed ID: 20120673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing.
McBryde CW; Theivendran K; Thomas AM; Treacy RB; Pynsent PB
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Jan; 92(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 20048102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Five to Ten-Year Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Implant in the U.S.: A Single Institution's Experience.
Ford MC; Hellman MD; Kazarian GS; Clohisy JC; Nunley RM; Barrack RL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Nov; 100(21):1879-1887. PubMed ID: 30399083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
