These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1875875)
21. Courts, gender and "the right to die". Miles SH; August A Law Med Health Care; 1990; 18(1-2):85-95. PubMed ID: 2374456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The role of the clear and convincing standard of proof in right to die cases. Forte DF Issues Law Med; 1992; 8(2):183-203. PubMed ID: 1399495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Life and death decisions: a reply to Judge Peccarelli. Kramer IR John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):569-83. PubMed ID: 16622960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Re-thinking consent. Scofield GR Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1993; 8(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 8453239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Refusing life-sustaining medical treatment. Saunders EK Mo Med; 1990 Sep; 87(9):665-7. PubMed ID: 2215468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Artificial feeding and the right to die. The legal issues. Snyder L J Leg Med; 1988 Sep; 9(3):349-75. PubMed ID: 3147314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Courts, committees, and caring. Veatch RM Am Med News; 1980 May; 23(20):suppl 1-2, 11-3. PubMed ID: 10246552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan. Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The constitutional dimensions of the right to refuse medically assisted nutrition and hydration: an analysis of Cruzan. Karbal W J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):241-8, 256. PubMed ID: 10113286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Aspects of the dilemma: when and how should treatment be withheld or withdrawn? Frelick RW Del Med J; 1989 Jun; 61(6):305-7. PubMed ID: 2753191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Death, privacy, and the free exercise of religion. Stacy T Cornell Law Rev; 1992 Mar; 77(3):490-595. PubMed ID: 10117969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Equality for the elderly incompetent: a proposal for dignified death. Merritt TL Stanford Law Rev; 1987 Feb; 39(3):689-736. PubMed ID: 10281165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Deciding for the incompetent patient: the role of family members. Healey JM Conn Med; 1984 Jul; 48(7):477. PubMed ID: 6467937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The end of childhood. Lalani S Can Doct; 1986 Oct; 52(10):17-8. PubMed ID: 10278827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bludworth. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11643875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Life-support withdrawal: law of commiseration or principle? Byrnes JC Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):331-54. PubMed ID: 11651213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Mrs. Wanglie and "doctor knows best" and making decisions for those who cannot decide for themselves: autonomy in two recent cases. Rouse F Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 1342345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The role of the courts in terminating life-sustaining medical treatment. Leibson CM Issues Law Med; 1995; 10(4):437-51. PubMed ID: 7737849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]