These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18758776)

  • 21. [Imageless computer navigation of hip resurfacing arthroplasty].
    Schnurr C; Nessler J; Koebke J; Michael JW; Eysel P; König DP
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2010 Jul; 22(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 20676824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A validation model for measurement of acetabular component position.
    Malik A; Wan Z; Jaramaz B; Bowman G; Dorr LD
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Aug; 25(5):812-9. PubMed ID: 19553075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Accuracy measurements of acetabular cup positioning using CT less navigation].
    Blendea S; Troccaz J; Merloz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2007 Apr; 93(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 17401289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Functionality and accuracy of a fluoroscopic navigation system in the placement of the femoral component for hip resurfacing - a cadaver study].
    Gravius S; Belei P; de la Fuente M; Müller-Rath R; Radermacher K; Wirtz D; Mumme T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 18561082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Computer-assisted navigation in hip resurfacing arthroplasty - a single-surgeon experience.
    Shields JS; Seyler TM; Maguire C; Jinnah RH
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):164-7. PubMed ID: 19583547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Does the tibial component remain at malposition risk?
    Bové JC
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Sep; 96(5):536-42. PubMed ID: 20605549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty.
    Lecerf G; Fessy MH; Philippot R; Massin P; Giraud F; Flecher X; Girard J; Mertl P; Marchetti E; Stindel E
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 May; 95(3):210-9. PubMed ID: 19423418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. No added value for Computer-Assisted surgery to improve femoral component positioning and Patient Reported Outcomes in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty; a multi-center randomized controlled trial.
    Koper MC; Reijman M; van Es EM; Waarsing JH; Koot HWJ; Keizer SB; Jansen I; van Biezen FC; Verhaar JAN; Bos PK
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Oct; 20(1):473. PubMed ID: 31651318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative repeatability of guide-pin axis positioning in computer-assisted and manual femoral head resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Hodgson A; Helmy N; Masri BA; Greidanus NV; Inkpen KB; Duncan CP; Garbuz DS; Anglin C
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Oct; 221(7):713-24. PubMed ID: 18019459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of computer navigation on trainee learning in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Saithna A; Dekker AP
    Comput Aided Surg; 2009; 14(4-6):117-22. PubMed ID: 20121591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A custom-made guide for femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: development and validation study.
    Audenaert E; De Smedt K; Gelaude F; Clijmans T; Pattyn C; Geebelen B
    Comput Aided Surg; 2011; 16(6):304-9. PubMed ID: 21916560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Imageless navigation of hip resurfacing arthroplasty increases the implant accuracy.
    Schnurr C; Michael JW; Eysel P; König DP
    Int Orthop; 2009 Apr; 33(2):365-72. PubMed ID: 18157534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computer navigated hip resurfacing for patients with abnormal femoral anatomy.
    Olsen M; Schemitsch EH
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19583546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysis.
    Seyler TM; Lai LP; Sprinkle DI; Ward WG; Jinnah RH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Aug; 90 Suppl 3():71-80. PubMed ID: 18676940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
    Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
    Rosenberger RE; Hoser C; Quirbach S; Attal R; Hennerbichler A; Fink C
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 Mar; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 18157493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The use of computer navigation in hip arthroplasty: literature review and evidence today.
    Punwar S; Khan WS; Longo UG
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2011; 13(5):431-8. PubMed ID: 22147432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A Patient-Specific Instrument for Femoral Stem Placement During Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Ito H; Tanaka S; Tanaka T; Oshima H; Tanaka S
    Orthopedics; 2017 Mar; 40(2):e374-e377. PubMed ID: 27841929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A low-cost solution for the restoration of femoral head centre during total hip arthroplasty.
    Hill JC; Salazar-Torres JJ; Orr JF; Archbold HA; Beverland DE
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jun; 227(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 23636755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Role of navigation in total hip arthroplasty.
    Kelley TC; Swank ML
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Feb; 91 Suppl 1():153-8. PubMed ID: 19182044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.