These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18759725)

  • 1. Does practice make perfect? The effect of coaching and retesting on selection tests used for admission to an Australian medical school.
    Griffin B; Harding DW; Wilson IG; Yeomans ND
    Med J Aust; 2008 Sep; 189(5):270-3. PubMed ID: 18759725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The change from UMAT to UCAT for undergraduate medical school applicants: impact on selection outcomes.
    Griffin B; Horton GL; Lampe L; Shulruf B; Hu W
    Med J Aust; 2021 Feb; 214(2):84-89. PubMed ID: 33258184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of commercial coaching on selection test performance.
    Griffin B; Carless S; Wilson I
    Med Teach; 2013 Apr; 35(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 23228084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practice effects in medical school entrance testing with the undergraduate medicine and health sciences admission test (UMAT).
    Puddey IB; Mercer A; Andrich D; Styles I
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Mar; 14():48. PubMed ID: 24618021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Socio-economic predictors of performance in the Undergraduate Medicine and Health Sciences Admission Test (UMAT).
    Puddey IB; Mercer A
    BMC Med Educ; 2013 Nov; 13():155. PubMed ID: 24286571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Students coached for an admission test perform less well throughout a medical course.
    Griffin B; Yeomans ND; Wilson IG
    Intern Med J; 2013 Aug; 43(8):927-32. PubMed ID: 23611119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of UMAT scores and GPA in prediction of performance in medical school: a national study.
    Poole P; Shulruf B; Rudland J; Wilkinson T
    Med Educ; 2012 Feb; 46(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 22239330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relative predictive value of undergraduate versus graduate selection tools in two Australian medical schools.
    Mercer A; Hay M; Hodgson WC; Canny BJ; Puddey IB
    Med Teach; 2018 Nov; 40(11):1183-1190. PubMed ID: 29355058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The utility of multiple mini-interviews: experience of a medical school.
    Kim KJ; Nam KS; Kwon BS
    Korean J Med Educ; 2017 Mar; 29(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 28264549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selecting top candidates for medical school selection interviews- a non-compensatory approach.
    Shulruf B; O'Sullivan A; Velan G
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Apr; 20(1):113. PubMed ID: 32295582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association between a medical school admission process using the multiple mini-interview and national licensing examination scores.
    Eva KW; Reiter HI; Rosenfeld J; Trinh K; Wood TJ; Norman GR
    JAMA; 2012 Dec; 308(21):2233-40. PubMed ID: 23212501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does practice make perfect? The effect of coaching and retesting on selection tests used for admission to an Australian medical school.
    Wong CX; Roberts-Thomson RL
    Med J Aust; 2009 Jan; 190(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 19236303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison.
    Razack S; Faremo S; Drolet F; Snell L; Wiseman J; Pickering J
    Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):993-1000. PubMed ID: 19769649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive validity of the Undergraduate Medicine and Health Sciences Admission Test for medical students' academic performance.
    Wilkinson D; Zhang J; Parker M
    Med J Aust; 2011 Apr; 194(7):341-4. PubMed ID: 21470083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictive validity of the Dundee multiple mini-interview.
    Husbands A; Dowell J
    Med Educ; 2013 Jul; 47(7):717-25. PubMed ID: 23746161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Associations between the big five personality factors and multiple mini-interviews.
    Griffin B; Wilson I
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2012 Aug; 17(3):377-88. PubMed ID: 21751103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Undergraduate Medical and Health Sciences Admissions Test: what is it measuring?
    Griffin B; Carless S; Wilson I
    Med Teach; 2013 Sep; 35(9):727-30. PubMed ID: 23795956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The fairness, predictive validity and acceptability of multiple mini interview in an internationally diverse student population--a mixed methods study.
    Kelly ME; Dowell J; Husbands A; Newell J; O'Flynn S; Kropmans T; Dunne FP; Murphy AW
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Dec; 14():267. PubMed ID: 25528046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Emotional intelligence in medical students: does it correlate with selection measures?
    Carr SE
    Med Educ; 2009 Nov; 43(11):1069-77. PubMed ID: 19874500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Same admissions tools, different outcomes: a critical perspective on predictive validity in three undergraduate medical schools.
    Edwards D; Friedman T; Pearce J
    BMC Med Educ; 2013 Dec; 13():173. PubMed ID: 24373207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.