These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18760407)

  • 1. Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground.
    Barr DJ
    Cognition; 2008 Oct; 109(1):18-40. PubMed ID: 18760407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony.
    Regel S; Coulson S; Gunter TC
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1311():121-35. PubMed ID: 19900421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: the on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension.
    Arnold JE; Kam CL; Tanenhaus MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):914-30. PubMed ID: 17723069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. I know what you're probably going to say: Listener adaptation to variable use of uncertainty expressions.
    Schuster S; Degen J
    Cognition; 2020 Oct; 203():104285. PubMed ID: 32535344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lexical competition during second-language listening: sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon.
    Chambers CG; Cooke H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1029-40. PubMed ID: 19586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Children's avoidance of lexical overlap: a pragmatic account.
    Diesendruck G; Markson L
    Dev Psychol; 2001 Sep; 37(5):630-41. PubMed ID: 11552759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The neural integration of speaker and message.
    Van Berkum JJ; van den Brink D; Tesink CM; Kos M; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):580-91. PubMed ID: 18052777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processing reduced word-forms in speech perception using probabilistic knowledge about speech production.
    Mitterer H; McQueen JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):244-63. PubMed ID: 19170486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What do you know? ERP evidence for immediate use of common ground during online reference resolution.
    Sikos L; Tomlinson SB; Heins C; Grodner DJ
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():275-285. PubMed ID: 30388433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychoacoustic studies on the processing of vocal interjections: how to disentangle lexical and prosodic information?
    Dietrich S; Ackermann H; Szameitat DP; Alter K
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 156():295-302. PubMed ID: 17015087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. You said it before and you'll say it again: expectations of consistency in communication.
    Shintel H; Keysar B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):357-69. PubMed ID: 17352617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bilingual lexical access in context: evidence from eye movements during reading.
    Libben MR; Titone DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 19271853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What constrains children's learning of novel shape terms?
    O'Hanlon CG; Roberson D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Jun; 97(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 17292387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Privileged versus shared knowledge about object identity in real-time referential processing.
    Mozuraitis M; Chambers CG; Daneman M
    Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():148-65. PubMed ID: 26048297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue.
    Branigan HP; Pickering MJ; McLean JF; Cleland AA
    Cognition; 2007 Aug; 104(2):163-97. PubMed ID: 16876778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The developmental relation between cognitive stage and the comprehension of speaker uncertainty.
    Green MG
    Child Dev; 1979 Sep; 50(3):666-74. PubMed ID: 498845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of perspective in identifying domains of reference.
    Heller D; Grodner D; Tanenhaus MK
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):831-6. PubMed ID: 18586232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spontaneous perspective-taking in real-time language comprehension: evidence from eye-movements and grain of coordination.
    Wei Y; Wan Y; Tanenhaus MK
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8031. PubMed ID: 38580679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Communicating emotion: linking affective prosody and word meaning.
    Nygaard LC; Queen JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):1017-30. PubMed ID: 18665742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Disfluency in Online Interpretation of Deception.
    Loy JE; Rohde H; Corley M
    Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6():1434-1456. PubMed ID: 27246116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.