425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18760439)
41. Humic Acid fouling mitigation by antiscalant in reverse osmosis system.
Yang Q; Liu Y; Li Y
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jul; 44(13):5153-8. PubMed ID: 20527757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The effect of colloid stability of wastewater treatment plants effluent on nanofiltration performance.
Schrader GA; Zwijnenburg A; Wessling M
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):345-57. PubMed ID: 16459809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of SAR (sodium adsorption ratio) between RO and NF processes for the reclamation of secondary effluent.
Chang IS; Lee EW; Oh S; Kim Y
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):313-8. PubMed ID: 16003991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Role of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes.
Herzberg M; Kang S; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(12):4393-8. PubMed ID: 19603652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Characteristics of organic fouling, reversibility by physical cleaning and concentrates in forward osmosis membrane processes for wastewater reclamation.
Jung J; Ryu J; Yu Y; Kweon J
Chemosphere; 2020 Apr; 245():125787. PubMed ID: 31959357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. An autopsy study of a fouled reverse osmosis membrane element used in a brackish water treatment plant.
Tran T; Bolto B; Gray S; Hoang M; Ostarcevic E
Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3915-23. PubMed ID: 17617435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Direct observations of membrane scale in membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment application.
Kim J; Yoon TI
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(9):2267-72. PubMed ID: 20418623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of two fractionation strategies for characterization of wastewater effluent organic matter and diagnosis of membrane fouling.
Kim HC; Dempsey BA
Water Res; 2012 Jul; 46(11):3714-22. PubMed ID: 22578431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Simulating and predicting the flux change of reverse osmosis membranes over time during wastewater reclamation caused by organic fouling.
Tong X; Wu YH; Wang YH; Bai Y; Zhao XH; Luo LW; Mao Y; Ikuno N; Hu HY
Environ Int; 2020 Jul; 140():105744. PubMed ID: 32353670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Interplay of different NOM fouling mechanisms during ultrafiltration for drinking water production.
Jermann D; Pronk W; Meylan S; Boller M
Water Res; 2007 Apr; 41(8):1713-22. PubMed ID: 17346766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Direct microscopic observation of forward osmosis membrane fouling.
Wang Y; Wicaksana F; Tang CY; Fane AG
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Sep; 44(18):7102-9. PubMed ID: 20735033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of MFI-UF constant pressure, MFI-UF constant flux and Crossflow Sampler-Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (CFS-MFI UF).
Sim LN; Ye Y; Chen V; Fane AG
Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1639-50. PubMed ID: 21194721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Fouling behavior of isolated dissolved organic fractions from seawater in reverse osmosis (RO) desalination process.
Yin W; Li X; Suwarno SR; Cornelissen ER; Chong TH
Water Res; 2019 Aug; 159():385-396. PubMed ID: 31121406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effective treatment of olive mill effluents from two-phase and three-phase extraction processes by batch membranes in series operation upon threshold conditions.
Ochando-Pulido JM; Hodaifa G; Victor-Ortega MD; Rodriguez-Vives S; Martinez-Ferez A
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 1():168-76. PubMed ID: 23602253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Membrane fouling and anti-fouling strategies using RO retentate from a municipal water recycling plant as the feed for osmotic power generation.
Chen SC; Amy GL; Chung TS
Water Res; 2016 Jan; 88():144-155. PubMed ID: 26492341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Forward osmosis filtration for removal of organic foulants: Effects of combined tannic and alginic acids.
Wang L; Zhang W; Chu H; Dong B
Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():251-63. PubMed ID: 26803261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Fouling characteristics of reverse osmosis membranes at different positions of a full-scale plant for municipal wastewater reclamation.
Tang F; Hu HY; Sun LJ; Sun YX; Shi N; Crittenden JC
Water Res; 2016 Mar; 90():329-336. PubMed ID: 26760485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effects of chemical cleaning on RO membrane inorganic, organic and microbial foulant removal in a full-scale plant for municipal wastewater reclamation.
Yu T; Meng L; Zhao QB; Shi Y; Hu HY; Lu Y
Water Res; 2017 Apr; 113():1-10. PubMed ID: 28183034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Reuse of olive mill effluents from two-phase extraction process by integrated advanced oxidation and reverse osmosis treatment.
Ochando-Pulido JM; Hodaifa G; Victor-Ortega MD; Rodriguez-Vives S; Martinez-Ferez A
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 1():158-67. PubMed ID: 23910394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Flux patterns and membrane fouling propensity during desalination of seawater by forward osmosis.
Li ZY; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Valladares-Linares R; Li Q; Zhan T; Amy G
Water Res; 2012 Jan; 46(1):195-204. PubMed ID: 22094000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
