366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18760654)
1. Biomechanical comparison between lumbar disc arthroplasty and fusion.
Chen SH; Zhong ZC; Chen CS; Chen WJ; Hung C
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Mar; 31(2):244-53. PubMed ID: 18760654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion with one or two cages by finite element analysis.
Chiang MF; Zhong ZC; Chen CS; Cheng CK; Shih SL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19):E682-9. PubMed ID: 16946641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
Grauer JN; Biyani A; Faizan A; Kiapour A; Sairyo K; Ivanov A; Ebraheim NA; Patel TCh; Goel VK
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Internal and external responses of anterior lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: nonlinear finite element analysis.
Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Maiman DJ; Pintar FA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 18525492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of Dynesys system screw profile on adjacent segment and screw.
Liu CL; Zhong ZC; Shih SL; Hung C; Lee YE; Chen CS
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):410-7. PubMed ID: 20683426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Beatson HJ; Serhan H; Sefter JC; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 19477694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does superior-segment facet violation or laminectomy destabilize the adjacent level in lumbar transpedicular fixation? An in vitro human cadaveric assessment.
Cardoso MJ; Dmitriev AE; Helgeson M; Lehman RA; Kuklo TR; Rosner MK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec; 33(26):2868-73. PubMed ID: 19092616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of pedicle and translaminar facet fixation in a multisegment interbody fusion model.
Eskander M; Brooks D; Ordway N; Dale E; Connolly P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):E230-5. PubMed ID: 17414898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc.
Denozière G; Ku DN
J Biomech; 2006; 39(4):766-75. PubMed ID: 16439247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Types of spinal instability that require interbody support in posterior lumbar reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical investigation.
Oda I; Abumi K; Yu BS; Sudo H; Minami A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1573-80. PubMed ID: 12865847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical comparison of lumbar total disc arthroplasty, discectomy, and fusion: effect on adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force.
Gao SG; Lei GH; He HB; Liu H; Xiao WF; Wen T; Liang JY; Li KH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Nov; 15(5):507-14. PubMed ID: 21780862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Basic scientific considerations in total disc arthroplasty.
Cunningham BW
Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):219S-230S. PubMed ID: 15541670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validated finite element analysis of the maverick total disc prosthesis.
Le Huec JC; Lafage V; Bonnet X; Lavaste F; Josse L; Liu M; Skalli W
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jun; 23(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 20068471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
