BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18761571)

  • 1. Is a "flexible" glass fiber-bundle dowel system as retentive as a "rigid" quartz fiber dowel system?
    Al-Tayyan MH; Watts DC; Kurer HG; Qualtrough AJ
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 18761571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents.
    Balbosh A; Ludwig K; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16126075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two luting agents used for the retention of cast dowel and cores.
    Habib B; von Fraunhofer JA; Driscoll CF
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 16336233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system.
    D'Arcangelo C; Cinelli M; De Angelis F; D'Amario M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 17854620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts.
    Artopoulou II; O'Keefe KL; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 16681499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of fatigue loading on four post-and-core systems in maxillary premolars.
    Bolhuis P; de Gee A; Feilzer A
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Sep; 35(8):657-67. PubMed ID: 15366533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length.
    Nissan J; Dmitry Y; Assif D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 11552168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fatigue resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three dowel-and-core systems.
    Goto Y; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Junge T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 15623997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of an adhesive resin luting agent on the dowel-head retention of three different core materials.
    Aksoy G; Cotert HS; Korkut L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 15867753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Micro push-out bond strengths of four fiber-reinforced composite post systems and 2 luting materials.
    Kececi AD; Ureyen Kaya B; Adanir N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jan; 105(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 17942331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture strength and nanoleakage of weakened roots reconstructed using relined glass fiber-reinforced dowels combined with a novel prefabricated core system.
    Amin RA; Mandour MH; Abd El-Ghany OS
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):484-94. PubMed ID: 24495157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of airborne-particle abrasion and aqueous storage on flexural properties of fiber-reinforced dowels.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):296-303. PubMed ID: 22394023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro evaluation of the retention of composite fiber and stainless steel posts.
    Gallo JR; Miller T; Xu X; Burgess JO
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Mar; 11(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 11935507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the retention of three endodontic dowel systems following different surface treatments.
    Kelsey WP; Latta MA; Kelsey MR
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):269-73. PubMed ID: 18086142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The retentive effects of pre-fabricated posts by luting cements.
    Sen D; Poyrazoglu E; Tuncelli B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jun; 31(6):585-9. PubMed ID: 15189317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of dowel space preparation and composite cement thickness on retention of a prefabricated dowel.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Mar; 11(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 11935506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of endodontic sealers on dowels luted with resin cement.
    Burns DR; Moon PC; Webster NP; Burns DA
    J Prosthodont; 2000 Sep; 9(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 11179464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of dentin conditioning on retention of airborne-particle-abraded, adhesively luted glass fiber-reinforced resin posts.
    Albashaireh ZS; Ghazal M; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Nov; 100(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 18992570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sealing ability of three fiber dowel systems.
    Santos V; Perdigão J; Gomes G; Silva AL
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):566-76. PubMed ID: 19515165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.