BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18761583)

  • 1. Mechanical properties of magnetic attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants.
    Boeckler AF; Morton D; Ehring C; Setz JM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):608-15. PubMed ID: 18761583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corrosion of dental magnet attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants.
    Boeckler AF; Ehring C; Morton D; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Setz JM
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 19210309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of sterilization on the retention properties of magnetic attachments for dental implants.
    Boeckler AF; Morton D; Ehring C; Setz JM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1206-11. PubMed ID: 19832767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retentive characteristics of overdenture attachments during repeated dislodging and cyclic loading.
    Chung KH; Whiting D; Kronstrom M; Chan D; Wataha J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 21479277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retentive forces of two magnetic systems compared with two precision attachments.
    Saygili G; Sahmali S
    J Oral Sci; 1998 Jun; 40(2):61-4. PubMed ID: 9680762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The measurement of retentive forces in mandibular complete overdenture with Magfit magnetic attachments].
    Du L; Xu C; Chao Y
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 21(5):366-8. PubMed ID: 14650991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tarnish and corrosion with the use of intraoral magnets.
    Drago CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Oct; 66(4):536-40. PubMed ID: 1791567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro comparison of the retentive properties of ball and locator attachments for implant overdentures.
    Türk PE; Geckili O; Türk Y; Günay V; Bilgin T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25216136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of stable retentive properties of overdenture attachments.
    Rutkunas V; Mizutani H; Takahashi H
    Stomatologija; 2005; 7(4):115-20. PubMed ID: 16501313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Measurements of the flux densities of static magnetic fields generated by two types of dental magnetic attachments and their retentive forces].
    Xu C; Chao YL; Du L; Yang L
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 May; 35(3):412-5. PubMed ID: 15181852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of detachment forces of two implant overdenture attachment types: effect of detachment speed.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW; Damrow MP; Galbraith CT
    Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 18795521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces.
    Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T; Kotecha S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 21426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W; Kousvelari E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 9109267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnet-retained implant-supported overdentures: review and 1-year clinical report.
    Ceruti P; Bryant SR; Lee JH; MacEntee MI
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2010; 76():a52. PubMed ID: 20943036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.