These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18761583)

  • 21. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Telescopic magnetic attachment for implant-supported denture: evaluation of splint effect.
    Chen J; Tomotake Y; Watanabe M; Ishida Y; Nagao K; Ichikawa T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):657-64. PubMed ID: 21691614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Retentive characteristics of Ankylos SynCone conical crown system over long-term use in vitro.
    Zhang RG; Hannak WB; Roggensack M; Freesmeyer WB
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 18637380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative study of the surface characteristics, microstructure, and magnetic retentive forces of laser-welded dowel-keepers and cast dowel-keepers for use with magnetic attachments.
    Chao Y; Du L; Yang L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15867758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
    Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Mechanical studies on dental magnetic attachments].
    Ishikawa S
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Mar; 60(1):98-120. PubMed ID: 8482913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The measurement of retentive force of laser-melted and cast post-keepers of Magfit magnetic attachments].
    Yang L; Du L; Lin Y
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 21(5):386-8. PubMed ID: 14650998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of attachment wear on retention of mandibular overdenture.
    Rutkunas V; Mizutani H; Takahashi H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jan; 34(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 17207077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time.
    Evtimovska E; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 19500236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment systems.
    Kobayashi M; Srinivasan M; Ammann P; Perriard J; Ohkubo C; Müller F; Belser UC; Schimmel M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 23566266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Testing the retention of attachments for implant overdentures - validation of an original force measurement system.
    Fromentin O; Lassauzay C; Abi Nader S; Feine J; de Albuquerque Junior RF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jan; 37(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19912482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Magnetic denture retention systems: inexpensive and efficient.
    Gillings BR
    Int Dent J; 1984 Sep; 34(3):184-97. PubMed ID: 6384053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of repeated insertion-removal cycles on the force and magnetic flux leakage of magnetic attachments: an in vitro study.
    Hao Z; Chao Y; Meng Y; Yin H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 24439071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retention of zirconia copings on zirconia implant abutments cemented with provisional luting agents.
    Kokubo Y; Kano T; Tsumita M; Sakurai S; Itayama A; Fukushima S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jan; 37(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19849775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments.
    Porter JA; Petropoulos VC; Brunski JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 12381065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Composite resin root coping with a keeper for magnetic attachment for replacing the missing coronal portion of a removable partial denture abutment.
    Maeda Y; Nakao K; Yagi K; Matsuda S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 16911892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of arm design and chemical polishing on retentive force of cast titanium alloy clasps.
    Shimpo H
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):300-7. PubMed ID: 18205738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Retentive force of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant overdentures.
    Ohya K; Kanazawa M; Minakuchi S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2009 Apr; 53(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 19318077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.