These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18761583)

  • 41. The change in retentive force of magnetic attachment by abrasion.
    Huang Y; Tawada Y; Hata Y; Watanabe F
    Odontology; 2008 Jul; 96(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 18661208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
    Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Trend of change in retentive force for bar attachments with different materials.
    Saito M; Kanazawa M; Takahashi H; Uo M; Minakuchi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1545-52. PubMed ID: 25023010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparative study of retentive anchor systems for overdentures.
    Svetlize CA; Bodereau EF
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Jun; 35(6):443-8. PubMed ID: 15202589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Retentive force variations in three polyamide and a polyetheretherketone denture attachments for implant-supported overdentures: An in vitro study.
    Βei M; Kamalakidis SN; Pissiotis AL; Michalakis K; Naka O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37244792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Orientation of retentive matrices on spherical attachments independent of implant parallelism.
    Wiemeyer AS; Agar JR; Kazemi RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Oct; 86(4):434-7. PubMed ID: 11677540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs.
    Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F; Yordshahian F
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21905896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years.
    Kaufmann R; Friedli M; Hug S; Mericske-Stern R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):233-41; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 19548404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: 6-month fatigue retention values.
    Doukas D; Michelinakis G; Smith PW; Barclay CW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 18546771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effect of denture cleansing solutions on the retention of pink locator attachments after multiple pulls: an in vitro study.
    You W; Masri R; Romberg E; Driscoll CF; You T
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):464-9. PubMed ID: 21777332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effect of denture cleansing solutions on the retention of pink Locator attachments: an in vitro study.
    Nguyen CT; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Apr; 19(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 20040032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effect of magnetic attachment with stress breaker on lateral stress to abutment tooth under overdenture.
    Gonda T; Ikebe K; Ono T; Nokubi T
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 31(10):1001-6. PubMed ID: 15387841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study.
    Maeda Y; Horisaka M; Yagi K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18081872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of spatial arrangement and clinical service lifetime simulation on the retention of magnetic units used in implant-anchored orbital prostheses.
    Artopoulou II; Zinelis S; Lemon JC; Polyzois G; Chambers MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):811.e1-811.e9. PubMed ID: 36890002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Freedom of rotation of selected overdenture attachments: an in vitro study.
    Chen IC; Brudvik JS; Mancl LA; Rubenstein JE; Chitswe K; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Aug; 106(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 21821161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Wear simulation effects on overdenture stud attachments.
    Rutkunas V; Mizutani H; Takahashi H; Iwasaki N
    Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(6):845-53. PubMed ID: 22123008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The force-distance properties of attracting magnetic attachments for tooth movement in combination with clear sequential aligners.
    Phelan A; Petocz P; Walsh W; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):159-69. PubMed ID: 23304964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
    Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Viability of magnetic denture retainers: a 3-year case report.
    Thean HP; Khor SK; Loh PL
    Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(7):517-20. PubMed ID: 11495563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.