BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

6260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18762031)

  • 21. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading.
    Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An in vitro comparison of shear bond strength of zirconia to enamel using different surface treatments.
    Zandparsa R; Talua NA; Finkelman MD; Schaus SE
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 23890275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of surface conditioning modalities on the repair bond strength of resin composite to the zirconia core / veneering ceramic complex.
    Ozcan M; Valandro LF; Pereira SM; Amaral R; Bottino MA; Pekkan G
    J Adhes Dent; 2013 Jun; 15(3):207-10. PubMed ID: 23700578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surface roughness and bond strengths of glass-infiltrated alumina-ceramics prepared using various surface treatments.
    Ersu B; Yuzugullu B; Ruya Yazici A; Canay S
    J Dent; 2009 Nov; 37(11):848-56. PubMed ID: 19616883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of a high fracture toughness composite ceramic for dental applications.
    Aboushelib MN; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):538-44. PubMed ID: 18761572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ceramic (Feldspathic & IPS Empress II) vs. laboratory composite (Gradia) veneers; a comparison between their shear bond strength to enamel; an in vitro study.
    Nikzad S; Azari A; Dehgan S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 20085614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of different bonding agents on shear bond strengths of composite-bonded porcelain to enamel.
    Cura C; Saraçoglu A; Cötert HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 12690353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of composite resin to IPS Empress 2.
    Panah FG; Rezai SM; Ahmadian L
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jul; 17(5):409-14. PubMed ID: 18717831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of the silicone disclosing procedure on the shear bond strength of composite cements to ceramic restorations.
    Szep S; Schmid C; Weigl P; Hahn L; Heidemann D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 12589288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of etching time and resin bond on the flexural strength of IPS e.max Press glass ceramic.
    Xiaoping L; Dongfeng R; Silikas N
    Dent Mater; 2014 Dec; 30(12):e330-6. PubMed ID: 25189110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of glazed zirconia on dual-cure luting agent bond strength.
    Valentino TA; Borges GA; Borges LH; Platt JA; Correr-Sobrinho L
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 22166107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of post-silanization drying on the bond strength of composite to ceramic.
    Shen C; Oh WS; Williams JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):453-8. PubMed ID: 15153853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of die spacer thickness on shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneers.
    Cho SH; Chang WG; Lim BS; Lee YK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 16543017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems.
    Ozcan M; Valandro LF; Amaral R; Leite F; Bottino MA
    Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):1477-83. PubMed ID: 19671476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of internal surface treatments on tensile bond strength for two ceramic systems.
    Kiyan VH; Saraceni CH; da Silveira BL; Aranha AC; Eduardo Cda P
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):457-65. PubMed ID: 17910222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vitro evaluation of long-term bonding of Procera AllCeram alumina restorations with a modified resin luting agent.
    Blatz MB; Sadan A; Arch GH; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 12690351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of bond strength of various margin ceramics to a zirconia ceramic.
    Cömlekoğlu ME; Dündar M; Ozcan M; Güngör MA; Gökçe B; Artunç C
    J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):822-7. PubMed ID: 18620791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics.
    Aboushelib MN; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
    Dent Mater; 2006 Sep; 22(9):857-63. PubMed ID: 16376981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 313.