6260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18762031)
21. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading.
Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET
Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An in vitro comparison of shear bond strength of zirconia to enamel using different surface treatments.
Zandparsa R; Talua NA; Finkelman MD; Schaus SE
J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 23890275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of surface conditioning modalities on the repair bond strength of resin composite to the zirconia core / veneering ceramic complex.
Ozcan M; Valandro LF; Pereira SM; Amaral R; Bottino MA; Pekkan G
J Adhes Dent; 2013 Jun; 15(3):207-10. PubMed ID: 23700578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Surface roughness and bond strengths of glass-infiltrated alumina-ceramics prepared using various surface treatments.
Ersu B; Yuzugullu B; Ruya Yazici A; Canay S
J Dent; 2009 Nov; 37(11):848-56. PubMed ID: 19616883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of a high fracture toughness composite ceramic for dental applications.
Aboushelib MN; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):538-44. PubMed ID: 18761572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ceramic (Feldspathic & IPS Empress II) vs. laboratory composite (Gradia) veneers; a comparison between their shear bond strength to enamel; an in vitro study.
Nikzad S; Azari A; Dehgan S
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 20085614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of different bonding agents on shear bond strengths of composite-bonded porcelain to enamel.
Cura C; Saraçoglu A; Cötert HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 12690353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of composite resin to IPS Empress 2.
Panah FG; Rezai SM; Ahmadian L
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jul; 17(5):409-14. PubMed ID: 18717831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of the silicone disclosing procedure on the shear bond strength of composite cements to ceramic restorations.
Szep S; Schmid C; Weigl P; Hahn L; Heidemann D
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 12589288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of etching time and resin bond on the flexural strength of IPS e.max Press glass ceramic.
Xiaoping L; Dongfeng R; Silikas N
Dent Mater; 2014 Dec; 30(12):e330-6. PubMed ID: 25189110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of glazed zirconia on dual-cure luting agent bond strength.
Valentino TA; Borges GA; Borges LH; Platt JA; Correr-Sobrinho L
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 22166107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of post-silanization drying on the bond strength of composite to ceramic.
Shen C; Oh WS; Williams JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):453-8. PubMed ID: 15153853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of die spacer thickness on shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneers.
Cho SH; Chang WG; Lim BS; Lee YK
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 16543017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems.
Ozcan M; Valandro LF; Amaral R; Leite F; Bottino MA
Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):1477-83. PubMed ID: 19671476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The influence of internal surface treatments on tensile bond strength for two ceramic systems.
Kiyan VH; Saraceni CH; da Silveira BL; Aranha AC; Eduardo Cda P
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):457-65. PubMed ID: 17910222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In vitro evaluation of long-term bonding of Procera AllCeram alumina restorations with a modified resin luting agent.
Blatz MB; Sadan A; Arch GH; Lang BR
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 12690351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of bond strength of various margin ceramics to a zirconia ceramic.
Cömlekoğlu ME; Dündar M; Ozcan M; Güngör MA; Gökçe B; Artunç C
J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):822-7. PubMed ID: 18620791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics.
Aboushelib MN; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
Dent Mater; 2006 Sep; 22(9):857-63. PubMed ID: 16376981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]