These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18763443)

  • 1. Attractive but guilty: deliberation and the physical attractiveness bias.
    Patry MW
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Jun; 102(3):727-33. PubMed ID: 18763443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluations of a male employee's allegation of sexual harassment by his female employer.
    Wuensch KL; Moore CH
    J Soc Psychol; 2004 Apr; 144(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 15074507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of a defendant's body weight on perceptions of guilt.
    Schvey NA; Puhl RM; Levandoski KA; Brownell KD
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2013 Sep; 37(9):1275-81. PubMed ID: 23295503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gender, Generations, and Guilt: Defendant Gender and Age Affect Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions in an Intimate Partner Homicide Trial.
    Ruva CL; Smith KD; Sykes EC
    J Interpers Violence; 2023 Dec; 38(23-24):12089-12112. PubMed ID: 37602736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attributions of guilt and punishment as functions of physical attractiveness and smiling.
    Abel MH; Watters H
    J Soc Psychol; 2005 Dec; 145(6):687-702. PubMed ID: 16334514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An attribution theory-based content analysis of mock jurors' deliberations regarding coerced confessions.
    Stevenson MC; McCracken E; Watson A; Petty T; Plogher T
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):348-366. PubMed ID: 37053386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Jurors' locus of control and defendants' attractiveness in death penalty sentencing.
    Beckham CM; Spray BJ; Pietz CA
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Jun; 147(3):285-98. PubMed ID: 17703790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
    Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors' perceptions and judgements.
    Hobson HM; Woodley J; Gamblen S; Brackely J; O'Neill F; Miles D; Westwood C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 58(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 36087284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Jurors' cognitive depletion and performance during jury deliberation as a function of jury diversity and defendant race.
    Peter-Hagene L
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Jun; 43(3):232-249. PubMed ID: 31120276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
    Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases.
    Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Jurors use mental state information to assess breach in negligence cases.
    Margoni F; Brown TR
    Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105442. PubMed ID: 36996604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Will jurors correct for evidence interdependence in their verdicts? It depends.
    Pate M; Kienzle M; Vogler V
    Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 30266044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Arbitrariness and the death penalty: how the defendant's appearance during trial influences capital jurors' punishment decision.
    Antonio ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):215-34. PubMed ID: 16557640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Racial bias in decisions made by mock jurors evaluating a case of sexual harassment.
    Wuensch KL; Campbell MW; Kesler FC; Moore CH
    J Soc Psychol; 2002 Oct; 142(5):587-600. PubMed ID: 12236469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Empathy and jurors' decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations.
    Haegerich TM; Bottoms BL
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Aug; 24(4):421-48. PubMed ID: 10974801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Capital jury deliberation: effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination.
    Lynch M; Haney C
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(6):481-96. PubMed ID: 19333746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.