BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1876376)

  • 1. Vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy: comparing sutures with absorbable staples.
    Stovall TG; Summitt RL; Lipscomb GH; Ling FW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):415-8. PubMed ID: 1876376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Abdominal hysterectomy without internal peritonealization: primary vaginal closure with stapler or open and drained vagina].
    Nagele F; Kurz C; Husslein P
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Apr; 54(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 8013858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new method of continuous vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy.
    Berman ML; Grosen EA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Sep; 84(3):478-80. PubMed ID: 8058253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective randomized study to compare a closed vault technique using absorbable staples at the time of abdominal hysterectomy versus open vault technique.
    Kalbfleisch RE
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Oct; 175(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 1411891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Barbed versus standard suture: a randomized trial for laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure.
    Einarsson JI; Cohen SL; Gobern JM; Sandberg EM; Hill-Lydecker CI; Wang K; Brown DN
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):492-8. PubMed ID: 23680517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy: comparing sutures with absorbable staples.
    Martens MG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Feb; 79(2):311-3. PubMed ID: 1731304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective comparison of abdominal hysterectomy using absorbable staples.
    Beresford JM; Moher D
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Jun; 176(6):555-8. PubMed ID: 8322128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The use of an automatic stapler in abdominal hysterectomies. Our experience].
    Rosaschino P; Palmerio G; Zambetti E; Gambarini A
    Minerva Ginecol; 1995 Apr; 47(4):143-6. PubMed ID: 7644095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduction of infectious morbidity with uterine stapling device.
    Martens MG; Shailer LD
    Adv Ther; 1991; 8(3):113-5. PubMed ID: 10150000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between unidirectional barbed and polyglactin 910 suture in vaginal cuff closure in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Morgan-Ortiz F; Contreras-Soto JO; Soto-Pineda JM; Zepeda MA; Peraza-Garay FJ
    Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():143-8. PubMed ID: 23860935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. V-Loc™ 180 suture in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a retrospective study comparing Polysorb to barbed suture used for vaginal cuff closure.
    Cong L; Li C; Wei B; Zhan L; Wang W; Xu Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Dec; 207():18-22. PubMed ID: 27816737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of 2 methods of vaginal cuff closure during robotic hysterectomy.
    Neubauer NL; Schink PJ; Pant A; Singh D; Lurain JR; Schink JC
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 120(1):99-101. PubMed ID: 23040405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does vaginal cuff closure decrease the infectious morbidity associated with abdominal hysterectomy?
    Korn AP; Grullon K; Hessol N; Lin P; Siopak J
    J Am Coll Surg; 1997 Oct; 185(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 9328390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of one- and two-layer vaginal cuff closure and open vaginal cuff during laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
    Shen CC; Hsu TY; Huang FJ; Roan CJ; Weng HH; Chang HW; Chang SY
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2002 Nov; 9(4):474-80. PubMed ID: 12386359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical stapling technique for radical hysterectomy.
    Fanning J; Hilgers RD; Palabrica C
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Nov; 55(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 7959281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.
    Rousseau JA; Girard K; Turcot-Lemay L; Thomas N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):265.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19254586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two suture materials, Dexon Plus and Maxon, in abdominal hysterectomy.
    Kiilholma P; Mäkinen J; Tenho T; Pitkänen Y; Hirvonen T
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1994; 208():47-9. PubMed ID: 8092771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vaginal cuff closure with absorbable bidirectional barbed suture during total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Bogliolo S; Nadalini C; Iacobone AD; Musacchi V; Carus AP
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):219-21. PubMed ID: 23820139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of new absorbable Lactomer subcuticular staple.
    Zachmann GC; Foresman PA; Bill TJ; Bentrem DJ; Rodeheaver GT; Edlich RF
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10147448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of barbed sutures for vaginal cuff closure during laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Kim SM; Baek JM; Song JY; Lee SJ; Park EK; Kim CJ; Lee YS
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Mar; 297(3):691-697. PubMed ID: 29289989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.