These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1876376)

  • 1. Vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy: comparing sutures with absorbable staples.
    Stovall TG; Summitt RL; Lipscomb GH; Ling FW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):415-8. PubMed ID: 1876376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Abdominal hysterectomy without internal peritonealization: primary vaginal closure with stapler or open and drained vagina].
    Nagele F; Kurz C; Husslein P
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Apr; 54(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 8013858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new method of continuous vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy.
    Berman ML; Grosen EA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Sep; 84(3):478-80. PubMed ID: 8058253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective randomized study to compare a closed vault technique using absorbable staples at the time of abdominal hysterectomy versus open vault technique.
    Kalbfleisch RE
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Oct; 175(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 1411891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Barbed versus standard suture: a randomized trial for laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure.
    Einarsson JI; Cohen SL; Gobern JM; Sandberg EM; Hill-Lydecker CI; Wang K; Brown DN
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):492-8. PubMed ID: 23680517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy: comparing sutures with absorbable staples.
    Martens MG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Feb; 79(2):311-3. PubMed ID: 1731304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective comparison of abdominal hysterectomy using absorbable staples.
    Beresford JM; Moher D
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Jun; 176(6):555-8. PubMed ID: 8322128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The use of an automatic stapler in abdominal hysterectomies. Our experience].
    Rosaschino P; Palmerio G; Zambetti E; Gambarini A
    Minerva Ginecol; 1995 Apr; 47(4):143-6. PubMed ID: 7644095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduction of infectious morbidity with uterine stapling device.
    Martens MG; Shailer LD
    Adv Ther; 1991; 8(3):113-5. PubMed ID: 10150000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between unidirectional barbed and polyglactin 910 suture in vaginal cuff closure in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Morgan-Ortiz F; Contreras-Soto JO; Soto-Pineda JM; Zepeda MA; Peraza-Garay FJ
    Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():143-8. PubMed ID: 23860935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. V-Loc™ 180 suture in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a retrospective study comparing Polysorb to barbed suture used for vaginal cuff closure.
    Cong L; Li C; Wei B; Zhan L; Wang W; Xu Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Dec; 207():18-22. PubMed ID: 27816737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of 2 methods of vaginal cuff closure during robotic hysterectomy.
    Neubauer NL; Schink PJ; Pant A; Singh D; Lurain JR; Schink JC
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 120(1):99-101. PubMed ID: 23040405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does vaginal cuff closure decrease the infectious morbidity associated with abdominal hysterectomy?
    Korn AP; Grullon K; Hessol N; Lin P; Siopak J
    J Am Coll Surg; 1997 Oct; 185(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 9328390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of one- and two-layer vaginal cuff closure and open vaginal cuff during laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
    Shen CC; Hsu TY; Huang FJ; Roan CJ; Weng HH; Chang HW; Chang SY
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2002 Nov; 9(4):474-80. PubMed ID: 12386359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical stapling technique for radical hysterectomy.
    Fanning J; Hilgers RD; Palabrica C
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Nov; 55(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 7959281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.
    Rousseau JA; Girard K; Turcot-Lemay L; Thomas N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):265.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19254586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two suture materials, Dexon Plus and Maxon, in abdominal hysterectomy.
    Kiilholma P; Mäkinen J; Tenho T; Pitkänen Y; Hirvonen T
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1994; 208():47-9. PubMed ID: 8092771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vaginal cuff closure with absorbable bidirectional barbed suture during total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Bogliolo S; Nadalini C; Iacobone AD; Musacchi V; Carus AP
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):219-21. PubMed ID: 23820139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of new absorbable Lactomer subcuticular staple.
    Zachmann GC; Foresman PA; Bill TJ; Bentrem DJ; Rodeheaver GT; Edlich RF
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10147448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of barbed sutures for vaginal cuff closure during laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Kim SM; Baek JM; Song JY; Lee SJ; Park EK; Kim CJ; Lee YS
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Mar; 297(3):691-697. PubMed ID: 29289989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.