These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18763889)
1. The role of short-term memory capacity and task experience for overconfidence in judgment under uncertainty. Hansson P; Juslin P; Winman A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1027-42. PubMed ID: 18763889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adult age differences in the realism of confidence judgments: overconfidence, format dependence, and cognitive predictors. Hansson P; Rönnlund M; Juslin P; Nilsson LG Psychol Aging; 2008 Sep; 23(3):531-44. PubMed ID: 18808243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The naïve intuitive statistician: a naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals. Juslin P; Winman A; Hansson P Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):678-703. PubMed ID: 17638502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Go with the flow: How to master a nonlinear multiple-cue judgment task. Olsson AC; Enkvist T; Juslin P J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1371-84. PubMed ID: 17087590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subjective probability intervals: how to reduce overconfidence by interval evaluation. Winman A; Hansson P; Juslin P J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Nov; 30(6):1167-75. PubMed ID: 15521796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the role of causal intervention in multiple-cue judgment: positive and negative effects on learning. Enkvist T; Newell B; Juslin P; Olsson H J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):163-79. PubMed ID: 16478348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Overconfidence effects in category learning: a comparison of connectionist and exemplar memory models. Sieck WR; Yates JF J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jul; 27(4):1003-21. PubMed ID: 11486916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Naïve point estimation. Lindskog M; Winman A; Juslin P J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):782-800. PubMed ID: 22905935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The cognitive substrate of subjective probability. Nilsson H; Olsson H; Juslin P J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):600-20. PubMed ID: 16060768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An application of the poisson race model to confidence calibration. Merkle EC; Van Zandt T J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Aug; 135(3):391-408. PubMed ID: 16846271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty. Krynski TR; Tenenbaum JB J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 17696692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simple predictions fueled by capacity limitations: when are they successful? Gaissmaier W; Schooler LJ; Rieskamp J J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):966-82. PubMed ID: 16938040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How to explain receptivity to conjunction-fallacy inhibition training: evidence from the Iowa gambling task. Cassotti M; Moutier S Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 20015585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Information integration in multiple cue judgment: a division of labor hypothesis. Juslin P; Karlsson L; Olsson H Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):259-98. PubMed ID: 17376423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. No age differences in complex memory search: older adults search as efficiently as younger adults. Lange EB; Verhaeghen P Psychol Aging; 2009 Mar; 24(1):105-15. PubMed ID: 19290742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Overconfidence: It Depends on How, What, and Whom You Ask. Klayman J; Soll JB; González-Vallejo C; Barlas S Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1999 Sep; 79(3):216-247. PubMed ID: 10471362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Between ignorance and truth: Partition dependence and learning in judgment under uncertainty. See KE; Fox CR; Rottenstreich YS J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1385-402. PubMed ID: 17087591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reducing cognitive biases in probabilistic reasoning by the use of logarithm formats. Juslin P; Nilsson H; Winman A; Lindskog M Cognition; 2011 Aug; 120(2):248-67. PubMed ID: 21640337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptions of randomness: why three heads are better than four. Hahn U; Warren PA Psychol Rev; 2009 Apr; 116(2):454-61. PubMed ID: 19348550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Delusion formation and reasoning biases in those at clinical high risk for psychosis. Broome MR; Johns LC; Valli I; Woolley JB; Tabraham P; Brett C; Valmaggia L; Peters E; Garety PA; McGuire PK Br J Psychiatry Suppl; 2007 Dec; 51():s38-42. PubMed ID: 18055936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]