These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18763898)

  • 1. Resting on laurels: the effects of discrete progress markers as subgoals on task performance and preferences.
    Amir O; Ariely D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1158-71. PubMed ID: 18763898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The automatic orienting of attention to goal-relevant stimuli.
    Vogt J; De Houwer J; Moors A; Van Damme S; Crombez G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 20079475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpreting visual preferences in the visual paired-comparison task.
    Richmond J; Colombo M; Hayne H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):823-31. PubMed ID: 17723062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
    Topolinski S; Strack F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The performance of bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in two versions of an object-choice task.
    Mulcahy NJ; Call J
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):304-9. PubMed ID: 19685972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Who's calling the shots? Intentional content and feelings of control.
    Sebanz N; Lackner U
    Conscious Cogn; 2007 Dec; 16(4):859-76. PubMed ID: 17045811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When perception is more than reality: the effects of perceived versus actual resource depletion on self-regulatory behavior.
    Clarkson JJ; Hirt ER; Jia L; Alexander MB
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Jan; 98(1):29-46. PubMed ID: 20053029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Context-sensitive adjustments of cognitive control: conflict-adaptation effects are modulated by processing demands of the ongoing task.
    Fischer R; Dreisbach G; Goschke T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):712-8. PubMed ID: 18444768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hierarchical encoding of behavior: translating perception into action.
    Hard BM; Lozano SC; Tversky B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):588-608. PubMed ID: 17087575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predispositions to approach and avoid are contextually sensitive and goal dependent.
    Bamford S; Ward R
    Emotion; 2008 Apr; 8(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18410191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Goal priming and the emotional experience of students with and without attention problems: an application of the emotional stroop task.
    Sideridis G; Vansteenkiste M; Shiakalli M; Georgiou M; Irakleous I; Tsigourla I; Fragioudaki E
    J Learn Disabil; 2009; 42(2):177-89. PubMed ID: 19251586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exemplar similarity and rule application.
    Hahn U; Prat-Sala M; Pothos EM; Brumby DP
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 19815187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Action type and goal type modulate goal-directed gaze shifts in 14-month-old infants.
    Gredebäck G; Stasiewicz D; Falck-Ytter T; von Hofsten C; Rosander K
    Dev Psychol; 2009 Jul; 45(4):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19586188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The goal of consistency as a cause of information distortion.
    Russo JE; Carlson KA; Meloy MG; Yong K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):456-70. PubMed ID: 18729710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What to do? The effects of discrepancies, incentives, and time on dynamic goal prioritization.
    Schmidt AM; DeShon RP
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Jul; 92(4):928-41. PubMed ID: 17638455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effect of goal setting on information processing in letter comparison tasks].
    Wegge J; Dibbelt S
    Z Exp Psychol; 2000; 47(2):89-114. PubMed ID: 10829614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The distinction between intuition and guessing in the SRT task generation: a reply to Norman and Price.
    Fu Q; Dienes Z; Fu X
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):478-80. PubMed ID: 20060746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How task representations guide attention: further evidence for the shielding function of task sets.
    Dreisbach G; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):477-86. PubMed ID: 19271860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.