These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1876413)

  • 21. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy.
    Benshoof J
    Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Population and family planning.
    Weinberger CW
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1974; 6(3):170-2. PubMed ID: 4463011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. U.S. Supreme Court considers new Title X regulations.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1991; 23(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 2029942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Trouble in Vineville: church property and the civil courts.
    Cribari SJ
    Health Prog; 1985; 66(6):55-9, 70. PubMed ID: 10274185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Roe v. Wade and the euthanasia debate.
    Bopp J; Coleson RE
    Issues Law Med; 1997; 12(4):343-54. PubMed ID: 9114604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Kassop N
    PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. 1982 Supreme Court decisions may hinder discrimination suits.
    McCarty P
    Am Nurse; 1983 Feb; 15(2):3, 9, 13. PubMed ID: 6549735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The value of the University of Michigan U.S. Supreme Court decision to dental education.
    Sinkford JC; Valachovic RW
    J Dent Educ; 2003 Sep; 67(9):963-4. PubMed ID: 14518833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. US court to rule whether law's anti-prostitution policy requirement violated free speech rights.
    McCarthy M
    BMJ; 2013 Apr; 346():f2641. PubMed ID: 23615602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Confidentiality.
    Kessler M
    Am J Art Ther; 1993 May; 31(4):106-8. PubMed ID: 10126360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
    Ferleger D; Scott PM
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Supreme Court to decide states' right to sue.
    Tokarski C
    Mod Healthc; 1990 Jan; 20(2):18. PubMed ID: 10106299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Lost in a doctrinal wasteland: the exceptionalism of doctor-patient speech within the Rehnquist Court's First Amendment jurisprudence.
    Berg PE
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1998; 8(2):153-77. PubMed ID: 10182216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. To bear or not to bear: reproductive freedom as an international human right.
    Hernández BE
    Brooklyn J Int Law; 1991; 17(2):309-58. PubMed ID: 11656131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ethical misconduct in healthcare financial management.
    Sandrick KM
    Hosp Financ Manage; 1993 Mar; 47(3):35-40, 42. PubMed ID: 11660171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Internet free speech wins court test.
    James JS
    AIDS Treat News; 1996 Jun; (no 249):4. PubMed ID: 11363597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Americans with Disabilities Act: disabled by court decisions.
    Coelho T
    Neurology; 2007 May; 68(20):1733-6. PubMed ID: 17502557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Supreme Court rulings favor employers.
    Vaccaro PL; Bryant MR
    Provider; 1999 Aug; 25(8):55, 57. PubMed ID: 10747611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The First Amendment and federal court deference to the Food and Drug Administration: The Times They Are A-Changin'.
    Basile EM; Gross M
    Food Drug Law J; 2004; 59(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 15190924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.