These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18765401)

  • 1. Attitudes about preconception sex selection: a focus group study with Americans.
    Kalfoglou AL; Scott J; Hudson K
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Dec; 23(12):2731-6. PubMed ID: 18765401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Opinions about new reproductive genetic technologies: hopes and fears for our genetic future.
    Kalfoglou AL; Doksum T; Bernhardt B; Geller G; LeRoy L; Mathews DJ; Evans JH; Doukas DJ; Reame N; Scott J; Hudson K
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Jun; 83(6):1612-21. PubMed ID: 15950627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical arguments for and against sperm sorting for non-medical sex selection: a review.
    Kalfoglou AL; Kammersell M; Philpott S; Dahl E
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Mar; 26(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 23337421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chance, choice and control: lay debate on prenatal social sex selection.
    Scully JL; Banks S; Shakespeare TW
    Soc Sci Med; 2006 Jul; 63(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 16459006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gender preferences and demand for preconception sex selection: a survey among pregnant women in Pakistan.
    Zubair F; Dahl E; Sher Shah S; Ahmed M; Brosig B
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Feb; 22(2):605-9. PubMed ID: 17062579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A boy or a girl? The ethics of preconception gender selection.
    Flug J
    J Halacha Contemporary Society; 2004; (48):5-27. PubMed ID: 15540377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attitudes towards sex selection in the Western world.
    Van Balen F
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jul; 26(7):614-8. PubMed ID: 16856222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preconception sex selection demand and preferences in the United States.
    Dahl E; Gupta RS; Beutel M; Stoebel-Richter Y; Brosig B; Tinneberg HR; Jain T
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Feb; 85(2):468-73. PubMed ID: 16595229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex preference and interest in preconception sex selection: a survey among pregnant women in the north of Jordan.
    Ahmad Al-Akour N; Khassawneh M; Khader Y; Dahl E
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Jul; 24(7):1665-9. PubMed ID: 19359337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attitudes of graduating medical doctors toward using sex selection techniques in Jordan in 2009.
    Khassawneh M; Al-Akour N; Khader Y; Zayed F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jul; 284(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 20706745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of sperm sorting and associated reproductive technology for wildlife management and conservation.
    O'Brien JK; Steinman KJ; Robeck TR
    Theriogenology; 2009 Jan; 71(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 19010523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards an understanding of British public attitudes concerning human cloning.
    Shepherd R; Barnett J; Cooper H; Coyle A; Moran-Ellis J; Senior V; Walton C
    Soc Sci Med; 2007 Jul; 65(2):377-92. PubMed ID: 17449156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gender selection: pressure from patients and industry should not alter our adherence to ethical guidelines.
    Sauer MV
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 191(5):1543-5. PubMed ID: 15547523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Australian attitudes toward sex-selection technology.
    Kippen R; Evans A; Gray E
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Apr; 95(5):1824-6. PubMed ID: 21163475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A boy or a girl? A Hungarian survey regarding gender selection.
    Fejes I; Szöllosi J; Závaczki Z; Koloszár S; Pál A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(8):993-6. PubMed ID: 16862481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attitudes towards sex selection for non-medical reasons: a review.
    Hall S; Reid E; Marteau TM
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jul; 26(7):619-26. PubMed ID: 16856225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Explicating nurses' cardiac triage decisions.
    Arslanian-Engoren C
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 24(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 19114802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sex-sorting sperm by flow cytometry in pigs: issues and perspectives.
    Vazquez JM; Parrilla I; Roca J; Gil MA; Cuello C; Vazquez JL; Martínez EA
    Theriogenology; 2009 Jan; 71(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18977521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parental Opinions about the Expansion of the Neonatal Screening Programme.
    Detmar S; Dijkstra N; Nijsingh N; Rijnders M; Verweij M; Hosli E
    Community Genet; 2008; 11(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 18196913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors influencing the "sortability" of stallion spermatozoa into X- and Y-chromosome bearing populations.
    Clulow JR; Evans G; Morris LH; Maxwell WM
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2009 Jul; 113(1-4):220-8. PubMed ID: 19022595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.