134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1876556)
1. Effects of type of cage front and feed trough partitions on productivity and ingestive, agonistic, and fearful behaviors of egg-type hens.
Anderson KE; Adams AW
Poult Sci; 1991 Apr; 70(4):770-5. PubMed ID: 1876556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of type of cage partition, cage shape, and bird density on productivity and well-being of layers.
Ramos NC; Anderson KE; Adams AW
Poult Sci; 1986 Nov; 65(11):2023-8. PubMed ID: 3822981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of furnished cages for laying hens.
Appleby MC; Walker AW; Nicol CJ; Lindberg AC; Freire R; Hughes BO; Elson HA
Br Poult Sci; 2002 Sep; 43(4):489-500. PubMed ID: 12365505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of feeder space allocation on behavior of Hy-Line W-36 hens housed in conventional cages.
Thogerson CM; Hester PY; Mench JA; Newberry RC; Pajor EA; Garner JP
Poult Sci; 2009 Aug; 88(8):1544-52. PubMed ID: 19590067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of perch availability during pullet rearing and egg laying on the behavior of caged White Leghorn hens.
Hester PY; Garner JP; Enneking SA; Cheng HW; Einstein ME
Poult Sci; 2014 Oct; 93(10):2423-31. PubMed ID: 25125558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Beak trimming effects on behavior patterns, fearfulness, feathering, and mortality among three stocks of White Leghorn pullets in cages or floor pens.
Lee HY; Craig JV
Poult Sci; 1991 Feb; 70(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 2027827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of toe-clipping and stocking density on laying hen performance.
Goodling AC; Satterlee DG; Cerniglia GJ; Jacobs-Perry LA
Poult Sci; 1984 Sep; 63(9):1722-31. PubMed ID: 6483737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of cage versus floor rearing environments and cage floor mesh size on bone strength, fearfulness, and production of single comb White Leghorn hens.
Anderson KE; Adams AW
Poult Sci; 1994 Aug; 73(8):1233-40. PubMed ID: 7971665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Production performance, use of nest box, and external appearance of two strains of laying hens kept in conventional and enriched cages.
Onbaşılar EE; Ünal N; Erdem E; Kocakaya A; Yaranoğlu B
Poult Sci; 2015 Apr; 94(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 25667426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of dietary energy content on the performance of laying hens in furnished and conventional cages.
Valkonen E; Venäläinen E; Rossow L; Valaja J
Poult Sci; 2008 May; 87(5):844-52. PubMed ID: 18420974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance, behavior, plasma corticosterone, and economic returns of laying hens in several management alternatives.
Koelkebeck KW; Cain JR
Poult Sci; 1984 Nov; 63(11):2123-31. PubMed ID: 6514660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the effects of cage height and stocking density on the behaviour of laying hens in furnished cages.
Albentosa MJ; Cooper JJ; Luddem T; Redgate SE; Elson HA; Walker AW
Br Poult Sci; 2007 Feb; 48(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17364534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Behavior, production, and well-being of the laying hen. 1. Effects of movable roosts, relationship of cage mates, and genetic stock.
Webster AB; Hurnik JF
Poult Sci; 1990 Dec; 69(12):2118-27. PubMed ID: 2084671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of vertical food-trough dividers on the feeding and agonistic behaviour of layer hens.
Preston AP; Mulder J
Br Poult Sci; 1989 Sep; 30(3):489-96. PubMed ID: 2819493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of separation of resources on behaviour, physical condition and production of laying hens in furnished cages.
Shimmura T; Azuma T; Eguchi Y; Uetake K; Tanaka T
Br Poult Sci; 2009 Jan; 50(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 19234928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fearful and associated responses of White Leghorn hens: effects of cage environments and genetic stocks.
Craig JV; Vargas Vargas J; Milliken GA
Poult Sci; 1986 Dec; 65(12):2199-207. PubMed ID: 3575210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of feeder space allocation on productivity and physiology of Hy-Line W-36 hens housed in conventional cages.
Thogerson CM; Hester PY; Mench JA; Newberry RC; Okura CM; Pajor EA; Talaty PN; Garner JP
Poult Sci; 2009 Sep; 88(9):1793-9. PubMed ID: 19687261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of cage and floor pen management on behavior, production, and physiological stress responses of laying hens.
Mench JA; van Tienhoven A; Marsh JA; McCormick CC; Cunningham DL; Baker RC
Poult Sci; 1986 Jun; 65(6):1058-69. PubMed ID: 3737515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of beak trimming and cage design on laying hen performance and egg quality.
Guesdon V; Ahmed AM; Mallet S; Faure JM; Nys Y
Br Poult Sci; 2006 Feb; 47(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 16546790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Egg production and welfare of laying hens kept in different housing systems (conventional, enriched cage, and free range).
Yilmaz Dikmen B; İpek A; Şahan Ü; Petek M; Sözcü A
Poult Sci; 2016 Jul; 95(7):1564-1572. PubMed ID: 26994200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
