BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1618 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18765967)

  • 1. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].
    Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H
    Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spurious systolic hypertension in young adults; prevalence of high brachial systolic blood pressure and low central pressure and its determinants.
    Hulsen HT; Nijdam ME; Bos WJ; Uiterwaal CS; Oren A; Grobbee DE; Bots M
    J Hypertens; 2006 Jun; 24(6):1027-32. PubMed ID: 16685201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of Heine Gamma G7 (G5) and XXL-LF aneroid devices for blood pressure measurement.
    Dorigatti F; Bonso E; Zanier A; Palatini P
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 17303985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of brachial artery pressure and derived central pressure in the measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysm distensibility.
    Wilson K; MacCallum H; Wilkinson IB; Hoskins PR; Lee AJ; Bradbury AW
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 22(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 11563897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transmission of calibration errors (input) by generalized transfer functions to the aortic pressures (output) at different hemodynamic states.
    Papaioannou TG; Lekakis JP; Karatzis EN; Papamichael CM; Stamatelopoulos KS; Protogerou AD; Mavrikakis M; Stefanadis C
    Int J Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 110(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16229910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of blood pressure and pulse pressure values obtained by oscillometric and central measurements in hypertensive patients.
    Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Yilmaz R; Demir K; Dogan Y; Ozhan H; Alihanoglu Y; Koc F; Bodur S
    Blood Press; 2010 Apr; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 20070247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The noninvasive estimation of central aortic blood pressure in patients with aortic stenosis.
    Rajani R; Chowienczyk P; Redwood S; Guilcher A; Chambers JB
    J Hypertens; 2008 Dec; 26(12):2381-8. PubMed ID: 19008716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fractional systolic and diastolic pressures act as predictors of coronary artery disease.
    Gu GQ; Cui W; Feng X; Liu F; Xie RQ; Lu JC; Yang XC; Yang XH; Zhang GM; Hao Y
    Blood Press; 2012 Jun; 21(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 22242563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pulse wave analysis on fingertip arterial pressure: effects of age, gender and stressors on reflected waves and their relation to brachial and femoral artery blood flow.
    Ahlund C; Pettersson K; Lind L
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2008 Mar; 28(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 18034848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of aortic and brachial cuff pressures in flat supine and lateral recumbent positions.
    Newton KM
    Heart Lung; 1981; 10(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 6912233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brachial or wrist blood pressure in obese patients: which is the best?
    de Senarclens O; Feihl F; Giusti V; Engelberger RP; Rodieux F; Gomez P; Liaudet L; Waeber B
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Jun; 13(3):149-51. PubMed ID: 18496290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating central systolic blood pressure during oscillometric determination of blood pressure: proof of concept and validation by comparison with intra-aortic pressure recording and arterial tonometry.
    Brett SE; Guilcher A; Clapp B; Chowienczyk P
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 22466804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of A&D UA-85X device for blood pressure measurement.
    Bonso E; Ragazzo F; Palatini P
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):339-41. PubMed ID: 19020424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oscillometric finger blood pressure versus brachial auscultative blood pressure recording.
    Iyriboz Y
    J Fam Pract; 1990 Oct; 31(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 2212968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of heart rate on central aortic pressures and hemodynamics: analysis from the CAFE (Conduit Artery Function Evaluation) study: CAFE-Heart Rate.
    Williams B; Lacy PS;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Aug; 54(8):705-13. PubMed ID: 19679248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of non-invasive calibration of radial waveforms on error in transfer-function-derived central aortic waveform characteristics.
    Hope SA; Meredith IT; Cameron JD
    Clin Sci (Lond); 2004 Aug; 107(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 15139848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The study of aortic stiffness in different hypertension subtypes in dialysis patients.
    Cheng LT; Chen HM; Tang LJ; Tang W; Huang HY; Gu Y; Wang T
    Hypertens Res; 2008 Apr; 31(4):593-9. PubMed ID: 18633169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring by brachial artery displacement method in high-risk surgical patients.
    Weiss BM; Spahn DR; Keller E; Seifert B; Pasch T
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1995 Nov; 12(6):555-63. PubMed ID: 8665877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 81.