432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18766032)
1. Comparison of donor-site morbidity of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.
Wu LC; Bajaj A; Chang DW; Chevray PM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Sep; 122(3):702-709. PubMed ID: 18766032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.
Chevray PM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lee KT; Mun GH
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 25536199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the donor-site morbidity using DIEP, SIEA or MS-TRAM flaps for breast reconstructive surgery: a meta-analysis.
Egeberg A; Rasmussen MK; Sørensen JA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1474-80. PubMed ID: 22841854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: Part II. Bilateral reconstruction.
Selber JC; Fosnot J; Nelson J; Goldstein J; Bergey M; Sonnad S; Serletti JM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Nov; 126(5):1438-1453. PubMed ID: 21042100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.
Wan DC; Tseng CY; Anderson-Dam J; Dalio AL; Crisera CA; Festekjian JH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative computed tomography angiogram to predict patients with favorable anatomy for superficial inferior epigastric artery flap breast reconstruction.
Piorkowski JR; DeRosier LC; Nickerson P; Fix RJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2011 May; 66(5):534-6. PubMed ID: 21407054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Bajaj AK; Chevray PM; Chang DW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Mar; 117(3):737-46; discussion 747-50. PubMed ID: 16525258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.
Erdmann-Sager J; Wilkins EG; Pusic AL; Qi J; Hamill JB; Kim HM; Guldbrandsen GE; Chun YS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Feb; 141(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 29019862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction.
Agarwal JP; Gottlieb LJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Apr; 58(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 17413875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: part I. unilateral reconstruction.
Selber JC; Nelson J; Fosnot J; Goldstein J; Bergey M; Sonnad SS; Serletti JM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1142-1153. PubMed ID: 20885239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perforator number predicts fat necrosis in a prospective analysis of breast reconstruction with free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps.
Baumann DP; Lin HY; Chevray PM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 May; 125(5):1335-1341. PubMed ID: 20440154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Chun YS; Sinha I; Turko A; Yueh JH; Lipsitz S; Pribaz JJ; Lee BT
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 20555301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A head-to-head comparison between the muscle-sparing free TRAM and the SIEA flaps: is the rate of flap loss worth the gain in abdominal wall function?
Selber JC; Samra F; Bristol M; Sonnad SS; Vega S; Wu L; Serletti JM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Aug; 122(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 18626349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediate Bilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Abdominally Based Flaps: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database.
Holoyda KA; Simpson AM; Ye X; Agarwal JP; Kwok AC
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2019 Oct; 35(8):594-601. PubMed ID: 31075801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome.
Nahabedian MY; Momen B; Galdino G; Manson PN
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Aug; 110(2):466-75; discussion 476-7. PubMed ID: 12142662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Immediate Unilateral Breast Reconstruction using Abdominally Based Flaps: Analysis of 3,310 Cases.
Kwok AC; Simpson AM; Ye X; Tatro E; Agarwal JP
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2019 Jan; 35(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 30085346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A cost-effectiveness analysis of DIEP vs free MS-TRAM flap for microsurgical breast reconstruction.
Tan MG; Isaranuwatchai W; DeLyzer T; Butler K; Hofer SOP; O'Neill AC; Zhong T
J Surg Oncol; 2019 Mar; 119(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 30562406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-analysis of the safety and factors contributing to complications of MS-TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction.
Wang XL; Liu LB; Song FM; Wang QY
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2014 Aug; 38(4):681-91. PubMed ID: 24902911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The efficacy of bilateral lower abdominal free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction.
Beahm EK; Walton RL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Jul; 120(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 17572543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
