These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18766368)

  • 21. Grating acuity and contrast tests for clinical trials of severe vision loss.
    Bittner AK; Jeter P; Dagnelie G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Oct; 88(10):1153-63. PubMed ID: 21747309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of contrast sensitivity in patients with advanced glaucoma: comparison of two tests.
    Jammal AA; Ferreira BG; Zangalli CS; Vianna JR; Thompson AC; Artes PH; Costa VP; Reis ASC
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 104(10):1418-1422. PubMed ID: 31974085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validation of the visual acuity iPad app Eye Chart Pro compared to the standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart in a low-vision population.
    Hazari H; Curtis R; Eden K; Hopman WM; Irrcher I; Bona MD
    J Telemed Telecare; 2022 Oct; 28(9):680-686. PubMed ID: 32985378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [A chart for low visual acuities: experience in a center for low vision and rehabilitation].
    Bonavolonta P; Travade I; Forte R; Rebeyrotte I; Adenis JP; Robert PY
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2010 Jun; 33(6):391-6. PubMed ID: 20493585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Repetitive tests of visual function improved visual acuity in young subjects.
    Otto J; Michelson G
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Mar; 98(3):383-6. PubMed ID: 24390163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Psychophysical measures of visual acuity in autism spectrum conditions.
    Tavassoli T; Latham K; Bach M; Dakin SC; Baron-Cohen S
    Vision Res; 2011 Aug; 51(15):1778-80. PubMed ID: 21704058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.
    Anstice NS; Jacobs RJ; Simkin SK; Thomson M; Thompson B; Collins AV
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170839. PubMed ID: 28152076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Teller II and Cardiff Acuity testing in a school-age deafblind population.
    Johnson C; Kran BS; Deng L; Mayer DL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 19214131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Psychophysical Validation of a Novel Active Learning Approach for Measuring the Visual Acuity Behavioral Function.
    Zhao Y; Lesmes LA; Dorr M; Bex PJ; Lu ZL
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 10(1):1. PubMed ID: 33505768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of visual acuity in macular degeneration patients measured with snellen and early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts.
    Falkenstein IA; Cochran DE; Azen SP; Dustin L; Tammewar AM; Kozak I; Freeman WR
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Feb; 115(2):319-23. PubMed ID: 17706288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Crowded letter and crowded picture logMAR acuity in children with amblyopia: a quantitative comparison.
    O'Boyle C; Chen SI; Little JA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):457-461. PubMed ID: 27388249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Feasibility of the Radner Reading Charts in low-vision patients.
    Burggraaff MC; van Nispen RM; Hoek S; Knol DL; van Rens GH
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 248(11):1631-7. PubMed ID: 20499082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An instrument capable of grading visual function: results from patients with retinitis pigmentosa.
    Tamai M; Kunikata H; Itabashi T; Kawamura M; Saigo Y; Sato H; Wada Y; Nakagawa Y
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 2004 Aug; 203(4):305-12. PubMed ID: 15297735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of visual function and prognosis for patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy with the low vision evaluator.
    Kunikata H; Nakagawa Y; Tamai M
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 2004 Nov; 204(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 15502423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Test-retest variability and correlations between tests of texture processing, motion processing, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity.
    Simpson TL; Regan D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Jan; 72(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 7731649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment in normal vision, artificially degraded vision, and in patients.
    Bach M; Maurer JP; Wolf ME
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 92(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 18303162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of CRT and LCD monitors for objective estimation of visual acuity using the sweep VEP.
    Straßer T; Leinberger DT; Hillerkuss D; Zrenner E; Zobor D
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2022 Oct; 145(2):133-145. PubMed ID: 35788850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Repeatability of Monocular Acuity Testing in Adults with and without Down Syndrome.
    Ravikumar A; Benoit JS; Morrison KB; Marsack JD; Anderson HA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Mar; 95(3):202-211. PubMed ID: 29461409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reliability of the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol in children 7 to <13 years old.
    Cotter SA; Chu RH; Chandler DL; Beck RW; Holmes JM; Rice ML; Hertle RW; Birch EE; Moke PS
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 136(4):655-61. PubMed ID: 14516805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visual Acuity Testing Using a Random Method Visual Acuity Application.
    Rhiu S; Lee HJ; Goo YS; Cho K; Kim JH
    Telemed J E Health; 2016 Mar; 22(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 26280910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.