149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18766413)
1. Outcomes of esophagectomy according to surgeon's training: general vs. thoracic.
Smith BR; Hinojosa MW; Reavis KM; Nguyen NT
J Gastrointest Surg; 2008 Nov; 12(11):1907-11. PubMed ID: 18766413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation.
Merkow RP; Bilimoria KY; McCarter MD; Phillips JD; DeCamp MM; Sherman KL; Ko CY; Bentrem DJ
Arch Surg; 2012 Nov; 147(11):1009-16. PubMed ID: 23165615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictors of Major Morbidity or Mortality After Resection for Esophageal Cancer: A Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database Risk Adjustment Model.
Raymond DP; Seder CW; Wright CD; Magee MJ; Kosinski AS; Cassivi SD; Grogan EL; Blackmon SH; Allen MS; Park BJ; Burfeind WR; Chang AC; DeCamp MM; Wormuth DW; Fernandez FG; Kozower BD
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Jul; 102(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 27240449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of Specialty Training and Trainee Involvement on Perioperative Outcomes of Esophagectomy.
Khoushhal Z; Canner J; Schneider E; Stem M; Haut E; Mungo B; Lidor A; Molena D
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Dec; 102(6):1829-1836. PubMed ID: 27570158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of surgeon demographics and technique on outcomes after esophageal resections: a nationwide study.
Gopaldas RR; Bhamidipati CM; Dao TK; Markley JG
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Mar; 95(3):1064-9. PubMed ID: 23261119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Initial clinical outcomes after completion of training in a Canadian Royal College thoracic surgery program.
Milman S; Ng T
Can J Surg; 2006 Dec; 49(6):422-6. PubMed ID: 17234072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trainee Involvement in Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Does Not Negatively Impact Outcomes.
Phillips AW; Dent B; Navidi M; Immanuel A; Griffin SM
Ann Surg; 2018 Jan; 267(1):94-98. PubMed ID: 27759620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Ivor-Lewis vs Sweet esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial.
Li B; Xiang J; Zhang Y; Li H; Zhang J; Sun Y; Hu H; Miao L; Ma L; Luo X; Chen S; Ye T; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Chen H
JAMA Surg; 2015 Apr; 150(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 25650816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of certification status of the institute and surgeon on short-term outcomes after surgery for thoracic esophageal cancer: evaluation using data on 16,752 patients from the National Clinical Database in Japan.
Motoyama S; Yamamoto H; Miyata H; Yano M; Yasuda T; Ohira M; Kajiyama Y; Toh Y; Watanabe M; Kakeji Y; Seto Y; Doki Y; Matsubara H
Esophagus; 2020 Jan; 17(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 31583502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 10-year ACS-NSQIP Analysis of Trends in Esophagectomy Practices.
Zheng R; Tham EJH; Rios-Diaz AJ; Grenda TR; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F; Berger AC
J Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 256():103-111. PubMed ID: 32683050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ivor Lewis approach is superior to transhiatal approach in retrieval of lymph nodes at esophagectomy.
Wolff CS; Castillo SF; Larson DR; O'Byrne MM; Fredericksen M; Deschamps C; Allen MS; Zais TG; Romero Y
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 18477255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre.
Sihag S; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Lanuti M; Allan JS; Mathisen DJ; Morse CR
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Sep; 42(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 22345284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
Lin J; Kang M; Lin J; Chen S; Deng F; Han W; Lin R
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 25273657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Surgeon Volume-outcome Relationship: Not Yet Ready for Policy.
Modrall JG; Minter RM; Minhajuddin A; Eslava-Schmalbach J; Joshi GP; Patel S; Rosero EB
Ann Surg; 2018 May; 267(5):863-867. PubMed ID: 28628561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Specialty training and mortality after esophageal cancer resection.
Dimick JB; Goodney PP; Orringer MB; Birkmeyer JD
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jul; 80(1):282-6. PubMed ID: 15975382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of partial versus total esophagectomy in the United States.
Jafari MD; Halabi WJ; Smith BR; Nguyen VQ; Phelan MJ; Stamos MJ; Nguyen NT
Ann Surg; 2013 Sep; 258(3):450-8. PubMed ID: 24022437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes after transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer.
Chang AC; Ji H; Birkmeyer NJ; Orringer MB; Birkmeyer JD
Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Feb; 85(2):424-9. PubMed ID: 18222237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. National trends in technique use for esophagectomy: Does primary surgeon specialty matter?
Dyas AR; Mungo B; Bronsert MR; Stuart CM; Mungo AH; Mitchell JD; Randhawa SK; David E; Stewart CL; McCarter MD; Meguid RA
Surgery; 2024 Feb; 175(2):353-359. PubMed ID: 38030524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mortality rate associated with 56 consecutive esophagectomies performed at a "low-volume" hospital: is procedure volume as important as we are trying to make it?
Santin B; Kulwicki A; Price P
J Gastrointest Surg; 2008 Aug; 12(8):1346-50. PubMed ID: 18543047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
