216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1876694)
21. Radon and the system of radiological protection.
Lecomte JF
Ann ICRP; 2012; 41(3-4):389-96. PubMed ID: 23089038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Changes in the "medical research" licensing procedure under the German Radiation Protection Ordinance].
Habeck M; Epsch R; Minkov V; Langer M; Griebel J; Brix G
Rofo; 2012 Jun; 184(6):513-9. PubMed ID: 22331822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Radiation protection: the NCRP guidelines and some considerations for the future.
Sinclair WK
Yale J Biol Med; 1981; 54(6):471-84. PubMed ID: 7342492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Should ICRP have prescribed an averaging period for the occupational dose limit in its basic general recommendations?
Fry RM; Carter MW
Health Phys; 1993 Mar; 64(3):319-20. PubMed ID: 8432652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Medical examination of the workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation].
Kato T
Rinsho Byori; 1991 Apr; 39(4):333-7. PubMed ID: 2051610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reference levels in the context of Fukushima - lessons learned and a challenge for the radiation protection system.
Sakai K
Ann ICRP; 2012; 41(3-4):282-5. PubMed ID: 23089027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Primary prevention in medical surveillance of workers exposed to ionizing radiations: personalized dose limit].
Malesani F
Med Lav; 2007; 98(5):381-406. PubMed ID: 17907532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radiation doses and risks from internal emitters.
Harrison J; Day P
J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):137-59. PubMed ID: 18495991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Discussion on optimisation below dose limit for public using background-cancer-risk-based approach.
Hattori T
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):206-8. PubMed ID: 21498410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Occupational exposure to X-radiation in Poland in the years 1966-1988.
Nowak B; Jankowski J
Pol J Occup Med; 1990; 3(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 2134321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dose limits to the lens of the eye: International Basic Safety Standards and related guidance.
Boal TJ; Pinak M
Ann ICRP; 2015 Jun; 44(1 Suppl):112-7. PubMed ID: 25816264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Towards a coherent conceptual framework for emergency preparedness/response and rehabilitation - the application of the new ICRP recommendations given in ICRP 103.
Weiss W
J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1002-4. PubMed ID: 19625114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Monitoring the eye lens: how do the international organisations react?
Behrens R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(1-2):75-8. PubMed ID: 25213264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Optimization of radiation protection for the control of occupational exposure in Ghana.
Gordon SW; Schandorf C; Yeboah J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(3):386-93. PubMed ID: 21163897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radar commentary: Use of linear no-threshold hypothesis in radiation protection regulation in the United States.
Siegel JA; Stabin MG
Health Phys; 2012 Jan; 102(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 22134084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Regulating exposure of the lens of the eye to ionising radiations.
Thorne MC
J Radiol Prot; 2012 Jun; 32(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 22555212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Radiation burden in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)].
Selmaier M; Stillkrieg W; Müller RG; Hahn EG; Ell C
Z Gastroenterol; 1994 Dec; 32(12):671-4. PubMed ID: 7871856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quality assurance of personal beta particle dosemeters used for individual monitoring of occupationally exposed persons.
Helmstädter K; Ambrosi P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):105-8. PubMed ID: 17337739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of radiological versus chemical toxicity limits for varying enrichments of uranium for Department of Energy facilities.
O'Connell P; Rabovsky J; Foulke J
Health Phys; 2010 Feb; 98 Suppl 1():S17-21. PubMed ID: 20065666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Analysis of the criteria used by the International Commission on Radiological Protection to justify the setting of numerical protection level values.
ICRP Supporting Guidance 5
Ann ICRP; 2006; 36(4):iii, 7-76. PubMed ID: 17371701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
