These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18767461)

  • 1. Roughness of human enamel surface submitted to different prophylaxis methods.
    Castanho GM; Arana-Chavez VE; Fava M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2008; 32(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 18767461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enamel roughness after air-powder polishing.
    Gerbo LR; Lacefield WR; Barnes CM; Russell CM
    Am J Dent; 1993 Apr; 6(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 8397992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Dental Prophylaxis Techniques on the Surface Roughness of Resin Composites.
    Gomes IA; Mendes HG; Filho EMM; de C Rizzi C; Nina MG; Turssi CP; Vasconcelos AJ; Bandeca MC; de Jesus Tavarez RR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jan; 19(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 29358532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.
    Barnes CM; Covey D; Watanabe H; Simetich B; Schulte JR; Chen H
    J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(4):76-87. PubMed ID: 26054183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of prophylactic treatments on the superficial roughness of dental tissues and of two esthetic restorative materials.
    Salami D; Luz MA
    Pesqui Odontol Bras; 2003; 17(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 12908062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
    Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of enamel preparation on the tensile bond strength of orthodontic composite resin.
    Gerbo LR; Lacefield WR; Wells BR; Russell CM
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(4):275-81; discussion 282. PubMed ID: 1333734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of prophylactic powders on the surface roughness of enamel.
    Fratolin MM; Bianco VC; Santos MJ; Rizkalla AS; Santos GC
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2014 Oct; 35(9):e31-5. PubMed ID: 25612331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Polishing after debracketing: its influence upon enamel surface.
    Vieira AC; Pinto RA; Chevitarese O; Almeida MA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1993; 18(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 8110615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of different prophylaxis methods on sealant adhesion.
    Sol E; Espasa E; Boj JR; Canalda C
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 11314145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of three prophylaxis methods on surface roughness of giomer.
    Kimyai S; Savadi-Oskoee S; Ajami AA; Sadr A; Asdagh S
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2011 Jan; 16(1):e110-4. PubMed ID: 20711162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-adjusting abrasiveness: a new technology for prophylaxis pastes.
    Lutz F; Sener B; Imfeld T; Barbakow F; Schüpbach P
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Jan; 24(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 8390065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods.
    Vidor MM; Felix RP; Marchioro EM; Hahn L
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 25992989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of prophylaxis regimens on surface roughness of glass ionomer cements.
    Wu SS; Yap AU; Chelvan S; Tan ES
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 15853102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The efficiency of cleaning fissures with an air-polishing instrument.
    Strand GV; Raadal M
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1988 Apr; 46(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 2839000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An electron microscopic evaluation of the enamel surface subsequent to various debonding procedures.
    Howell S; Weekes WT
    Aust Dent J; 1990 Jun; 35(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 2203330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advances in abrasive technology--prophylaxis pastes.
    Lutz F; Imfeld T
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Jan; 23(1):61-4, 66, 68 passim; quiz 72. PubMed ID: 11887699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of a paste-free prophylaxis polishing cup and various prophylaxis polishing pastes on tooth enamel and restorative materials.
    Covey DA; Barnes C; Watanabe H; Johnson WW
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):466-73; quiz 474-5. PubMed ID: 22313918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of prophylactic agents on shear bond strength of resin composite bonding to enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; O'Quinn JA
    Gen Dent; 1993; 41(6):557-9. PubMed ID: 23087954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of two powder-stream systems for tooth polishing].
    Leckel M; Lenz P; Gilde H
    ZWR; 1989 Jun; 98(6):518-21. PubMed ID: 2560602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.