These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18767515)

  • 1. Pediatric bitewing film holder: preschoolers' acceptance and radiographs' diagnostic quality.
    Pierro VS; Barcelos R; de Souza IP; Raymundo RJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 18767515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of bitewing radiographs in children in relation to the type of film holder used.
    Herman HD; Ashkenazi M
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jun; 14(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 23595621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An investigation into the use of bitewing radiography in children in Greater Glasgow.
    Taylor GK; Macpherson LM
    Br Dent J; 2004 May; 196(9):563-8; discussion 541. PubMed ID: 15131628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Additional diagnostic value of digital bitewing radiographs in detecting proximal caries in primary molars.
    Madiraju G
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011 Sep; 32(7):E115-9. PubMed ID: 23738994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of bitewing positioning devices in children's dentistry.
    Pitts NB; Hamood SS; Longbottom C; Rimmer PA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 1807994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Peker I; Toraman Alkurt M; Altunkaynak B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):495-9. PubMed ID: 18033947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Number and frequency of bitewing radiographs and assessment of approximal caries in 14-to-19-year-old Swedish adolescents.
    Edblad E; Gustafsson A; Svenson B; Jansson L
    Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(4):157-64. PubMed ID: 9850558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bitewing film quality: a clinical comparison of the loop vs. holder techniques.
    Kositbowornchai S; Phadannorg T; Permpoonsinsook M; Thinkhamrop B
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 15119720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Taking bitewing radiographs in preschoolers using behavior management techniques.
    Kaakko T; Riedy CA; Nakai Y; Domoto P; Weinstein P; Milgrom P
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1999; 66(5):320-4, 294. PubMed ID: 10631887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of bitewing radiographs in the management of dental caries: scientific and practical considerations.
    Pitts NB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 9084279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of illumination on the accuracy of identifying interproximal carious lesions on bitewing radiographs.
    Deep P; Petropoulos D
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003; 69(7):444-6. PubMed ID: 12880556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinically undetected dental caries assessed by bitewing screening in children with little caries experience.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 8181654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of conventional intra-oral radiography and computer imaging techniques for the detection of proximal surface dental caries.
    Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Aug; 21(3):127-34. PubMed ID: 1397467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and validation of two new image receptor-holding devices for overlapping reduction of proximal surfaces in bitewing radiography: a preclinical study.
    Cascante-Sequeira D; Gaêta-Araujo H; Peroni LV; Oliveira-Santos C; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 May; 50(4):20200449. PubMed ID: 33353388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of proximal caries depth determination using two intraoral film speeds.
    Jessee SA; Makins SR; Bretz WA
    Gen Dent; 1999; 47(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 10321157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of proximal carious lesions: two-film versus four-film bitewing radiography.
    Kaffe I; Gordon M; Laufer B; Littner MM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 May; 57(5):567-71. PubMed ID: 6587305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Initial development and in vitro evaluation of the HPL device for obtaining reproducible bitewing radiographs of children.
    Pitts NB; Hamood SS; Longbottom C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 May; 71(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 2047107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of bitewing radiographs in 5-year-old children.
    Holt RD; Abdulkarim NT; Rule DC
    Community Dent Health; 1990 Dec; 7(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 2292069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of film, desktop monitor and laptop displays in caries detection.
    Ludlow JB; Abreu M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 10202475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.