These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18767526)

  • 1. Assessing design features of virtual keyboards for text entry.
    O'Brien MA; Rogers WA; Fisk AD; Richman M
    Hum Factors; 2008 Aug; 50(4):680-98. PubMed ID: 18767526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Smartphone Text Input Method Performance, Usability, and Preference With Younger and Older Adults.
    Smith AL; Chaparro BS
    Hum Factors; 2015 Sep; 57(6):1015-28. PubMed ID: 25850116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Usage Position and Virtual Keyboard Design Affect Upper-Body Kinematics, Discomfort, and Usability during Prolonged Tablet Typing.
    Lin MI; Hong RH; Chang JH; Ke XM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0143585. PubMed ID: 26629989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Building and testing optimized keyboards for specific text entry.
    Francis G; Oxtoby C
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(2):279-87. PubMed ID: 16884049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of keyboard design on comfort and productivity in a text-entry task.
    Swanson NG; Galinsky TL; Cole LL; Pan CS; Sauter SL
    Appl Ergon; 1997 Feb; 28(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 9414336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The split keyboard: an ergonomics success story.
    Rempel D
    Hum Factors; 2008 Jun; 50(3):385-92. PubMed ID: 18689043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Text entry on handheld computers by older users.
    Wright P; Bartram C; Rogers N; Emslie H; Evans J; Wilson B; Belt S
    Ergonomics; 2000 Jun; 43(6):702-16. PubMed ID: 10902881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SwingBoard: introducing swipe based virtual keyboard for visually impaired and blind users.
    Ahmed I; Farrok O
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 May; 19(4):1482-1493. PubMed ID: 37098085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of a genetic algorithm to the keyboard layout problem.
    Onsorodi AHH; Korhan O
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0226611. PubMed ID: 31910214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of a split keyboard design and wrist rest on performance, posture, and comfort.
    Smith MJ; Karsh BT; Conway FT; Cohen WJ; James CA; Morgan JJ; Sanders K; Zehel DJ
    Hum Factors; 1998 Jun; 40(2):324-36. PubMed ID: 9720462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Touch a screen or turn a knob: choosing the best device for the job.
    Rogers WA; Fisk AD; McLaughlin AC; Pak R
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(2):271-88. PubMed ID: 16170938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Virtual Sliding QWERTY: A new text entry method for smartwatches using Tap-N-Drag.
    Cha JM; Choi E; Lim J
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Nov; 51():263-72. PubMed ID: 26154225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental comparisons of data entry by automated speech recognition, keyboard, and mouse.
    Mitchard H; Winkles J
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(2):198-209. PubMed ID: 12452268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design and evaluation of small, linear QWERTY keyboards.
    Hsiao HC; Wu FG; Chen CH
    Appl Ergon; 2014 May; 45(3):655-62. PubMed ID: 24075287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. I-Keyboard: Fully Imaginary Keyboard on Touch Devices Empowered by Deep Neural Decoder.
    Kim UH; Yoo SM; Kim JH
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2021 Sep; 51(9):4528-4539. PubMed ID: 31794415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the use of immersive virtual reality, mouse and touchscreen in pointing and dragging-and-dropping tasks among young, middle-aged and older adults.
    Chen J; Or C
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():437-448. PubMed ID: 28395855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Address entry while driving: speech recognition versus a touch-screen keyboard.
    Tsimhoni O; Smith D; Green P
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):600-10. PubMed ID: 15709323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational modeling of user errors for the design of virtual scanning keyboards.
    Bhattacharya S; Basu A; Samanta D
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2008 Aug; 16(4):400-9. PubMed ID: 18701386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigation of Chinese text entry performance for mobile display interfaces.
    Lin PH
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 25260062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of age in usability testing.
    Sonderegger A; Schmutz S; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Jan; 52():291-300. PubMed ID: 26360221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.