These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1876801)

  • 21. Chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations.
    Campbell I
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3661-75. PubMed ID: 17315184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Power of testing proportions in small two-sample studies when sample sizes are equal.
    Davis AB
    Stat Med; 1993 Apr; 12(8):777-87. PubMed ID: 8516594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparing several proportions when the exposure variable is either ordinal or ratio which has been grouped into discrete classes.
    Lee J
    Comput Biol Med; 1994 May; 24(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 7924266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of tests of contingency tables.
    Amiri S; Modarres R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(5):784-796. PubMed ID: 27936354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. More enlightenment on the essence of applying Fisher's Exact test when testing for statistical significance using small sample data presented in a 2 x 2 table.
    Kangave D
    West Afr J Med; 1992; 11(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 1476961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A cautionary note on exact unconditional inference for a difference between two independent binomial proportions.
    Mehrotra DV; Chan IS; Berger RL
    Biometrics; 2003 Jun; 59(2):441-50. PubMed ID: 12926729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Exact Bayesian p-values for a test of independence in a 2 × 2 contingency table with missing data.
    Lin Y; Lipsitz SR; Sinha D; Fitzmaurice G; Lipshultz S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Nov; 27(11):3411-3419. PubMed ID: 28633606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Order-restricted tests for stratified comparisons of binomial proportions.
    Agresti A; Coull BA
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 8805770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing two independent incidence rates using conditional and unconditional exact tests.
    Han C
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 17506083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Issues in biomedical statistics: analysing 2 x 2 tables of frequencies.
    Ludbrook J; Dudley H
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1994 Nov; 64(11):780-7. PubMed ID: 7945088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Statistical inference on categorical variables.
    Perkins SM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 404():73-88. PubMed ID: 18450046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Two-tailed significance tests for 2 × 2 contingency tables: What is the alternative?
    Prescott RJ
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(22):4264-4269. PubMed ID: 31264237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Yates's correction for continuity and the analysis of 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Peritz E
    Stat Med; 1992 Apr; 11(6):845-7. PubMed ID: 1510780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A revisit to contingency table and tests of independence: bootstrap is preferred to Chi-square approximations as well as Fisher's exact test.
    Lin JJ; Chang CH; Pal N
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):438-58. PubMed ID: 24905809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The size of the chi-square test for the Hardy-Weinberg law.
    Kang SH; Shin D
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 15604560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comments on 'Tests for the homogeneity of two binomial proportions in extremely unbalanced 2x2 contingency tables', by S.-H. Kang and C. W. Ahn, Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27:2524-2535.
    Martín Andrés A; Herranz Tejedor I
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 19125396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Exact confidence intervals for the relative risk and the odds ratio.
    Wang W; Shan G
    Biometrics; 2015 Dec; 71(4):985-95. PubMed ID: 26228945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Confidence intervals for a binomial proportion.
    Vollset SE
    Stat Med; 1993 May; 12(9):809-24. PubMed ID: 8327801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Elucidating the foundations of statistical inference with 2 x 2 tables.
    Choi L; Blume JD; Dupont WD
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0121263. PubMed ID: 25849515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Confidence intervals for the binomial parameter: some new considerations.
    Reiczigel J
    Stat Med; 2003 Feb; 22(4):611-21. PubMed ID: 12590417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.