BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

608 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18768360)

  • 1. Effect of foot orthoses on magnitude and timing of rearfoot and tibial motions, ground reaction force and knee moment during running.
    Eslami M; Begon M; Hinse S; Sadeghi H; Popov P; Allard P
    J Sci Med Sport; 2009 Nov; 12(6):679-84. PubMed ID: 18768360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forefoot-rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running.
    Eslami M; Begon M; Farahpour N; Allard P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17049700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of motion control shoes on the running gait of mature and young females.
    Lilley K; Stiles V; Dixon S
    Gait Posture; 2013 Mar; 37(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 23122596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orthoses posted in both the forefoot and rearfoot reduce moments and angular impulses on lower extremity joints during walking.
    Hsu WH; Lewis CL; Monaghan GM; Saltzman E; Hamill J; Holt KG
    J Biomech; 2014 Aug; 47(11):2618-25. PubMed ID: 24968944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of inverted orthoses on lower-extremity mechanics in runners.
    Williams DS; McClay Davis I; Baitch SP
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Dec; 35(12):2060-8. PubMed ID: 14652503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primary mechanical factors contributing to foot eversion moment during the stance phase of running.
    Tsujimoto N; Nunome H; Ikegami Y
    J Sports Sci; 2017 May; 35(9):898-905. PubMed ID: 27362583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tibial rotation in running: Does rearfoot adduction matter?
    Fischer KM; Willwacher S; Hamill J; Brüggemann GP
    Gait Posture; 2017 Jan; 51():188-193. PubMed ID: 27810691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of changing mediolateral center of pressure on rearfoot eversion during treadmill running.
    Mousavi SH; van Kouwenhove L; Rajabi R; Zwerver J; Hijmans JM
    Gait Posture; 2021 Jan; 83():201-209. PubMed ID: 33171373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association of navicular drop and selected lower-limb biomechanical measures during the stance phase of running.
    Eslami M; Damavandi M; Ferber R
    J Appl Biomech; 2014 Apr; 30(2):250-4. PubMed ID: 24145867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of changing foot progression angle using real-time visual feedback on rearfoot eversion during running.
    Mousavi SH; van Kouwenhove L; Rajabi R; Zwerver J; Hijmans JM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246425. PubMed ID: 33566828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orthotic intervention in forefoot and rearfoot strike running patterns.
    Stackhouse CL; Davis IM; Hamill J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Jan; 19(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 14659932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rearfoot strikes more frequently apply combined knee valgus and tibial internal rotation moments than forefoot strikes in females during the early phase of cutting maneuvers.
    Ogasawara I; Shimokochi Y; Mae T; Nakata K
    Gait Posture; 2020 Feb; 76():364-371. PubMed ID: 31901764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between rearfoot, tibia and femur kinematics in runners with and without patellofemoral pain.
    Luz BC; Dos Santos AF; de Souza MC; de Oliveira Sato T; Nawoczenski DA; Serrão FV
    Gait Posture; 2018 Mar; 61():416-422. PubMed ID: 29475152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short- and long-term influences of a custom foot orthotic intervention on lower extremity dynamics.
    MacLean CL; Davis IS; Hamill J
    Clin J Sport Med; 2008 Jul; 18(4):338-43. PubMed ID: 18614885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship between rearfoot, tibial and hip kinematics in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome.
    Barton CJ; Levinger P; Crossley KM; Webster KE; Menz HB
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Aug; 27(7):702-5. PubMed ID: 22436492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender differences in hip and ankle joint kinematics on knee abduction during running.
    Sakaguchi M; Ogawa H; Shimizu N; Kanehisa H; Yanai T; Kawakami Y
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2014; 14 Suppl 1():S302-9. PubMed ID: 24444222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Knee joint kinetics in response to multiple three-dimensional printed, customised foot orthoses for the treatment of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.
    Allan R; Woodburn J; Telfer S; Abbott M; Steultjens MP
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 Jun; 231(6):487-498. PubMed ID: 28639519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contributions of proximal and distal moments to axial tibial rotation during walking and running.
    Bellchamber TL; van den Bogert AJ
    J Biomech; 2000 Nov; 33(11):1397-403. PubMed ID: 10940398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contributions to the understanding of gait control.
    Simonsen EB
    Dan Med J; 2014 Apr; 61(4):B4823. PubMed ID: 24814597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dual-function foot orthosis: effect on shock and control of rearfoot motion.
    Butler RJ; Davis IM; Laughton CM; Hughes M
    Foot Ankle Int; 2003 May; 24(5):410-4. PubMed ID: 12801197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.