These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18768537)

  • 1. 'MetLife V. Glenn': the Court addresses a conflict over conflicts in ERISA benefit administration.
    Jost TS
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2008; 27(5):w430-40. PubMed ID: 18768537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of delegation on standard of review. Geddes v. United Staffing, 469 F.3d 919 (10th Cir. 2006).
    Benefits Q; 2009; 25(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 19408446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Will the Supreme Court finally eliminate ERISA preemption?
    Trueman DL
    Ann Health Law; 2004; 13(2):427-64, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15281484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recent developments in health insurance, life insurance, and disability insurance case law.
    Hasman JJ; Chittenden WA; Doolin EG; Wall JF
    Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2008; 43(3):473-517. PubMed ID: 18828249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strategies for Health System Innovation After Gobeille v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.
    Bland SE; Crowley JS; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2016 Aug; 316(6):581-2. PubMed ID: 27367856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subrogation or subterfuge: the myth of ERISA health benefit plans.
    Murphy GF
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2002; 19(1):309-33. PubMed ID: 12733230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ERISA update: the Supreme Court Texas decision and other recent developments.
    Butler PA
    State Coverage Initiat Issue Brief; 2004 Aug; 5(2):1-7. PubMed ID: 15298011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Supreme Court limits lawsuits against managed care organizations.
    Jost TS
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2004; Suppl Web Exclusives():W4-417-26. PubMed ID: 15451950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of Metropolitan Life v. Glenn on ERISA benefit denials: time for the "treating physician rule".
    Goodley J
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2010; 26(2):403-40. PubMed ID: 20662362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implications of ERISA for health benefits and the number of self-funded ERISA plans.
    Copeland C; Pierron B
    EBRI Issue Brief; 1998 Jan; (193):1-26. PubMed ID: 10177290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability.
    Mariner WK
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1347-52. PubMed ID: 15385665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Federal jurisdiction--reimbursement action by federal employee health plan administrator. Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc., d/b/a Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield v. McVeigh.
    Benefits Q; 2007; 23(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 17444083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health plan liability and ERISA: the expanding scope of state legislation.
    Hellinger FJ; Young GJ
    Am J Public Health; 2005 Feb; 95(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 15671453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Supreme court upholds state independent review laws: does this help or hinder health plans?
    Bloom A
    Manag Care Interface; 2002 Sep; 15(9):56-7, 61. PubMed ID: 12244651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should your ERISA remedy depend upon your geography?: an analysis of Rush Prudential HMO, INC. v. Moran.
    Schulz AM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2003; 19(2):553-71. PubMed ID: 14748257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health plans--enforcement of right to reimbursement not available under ERISA section 502(a)(3). Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company v. Knudson.
    Benefits Q; 2003; 19(2):98-9. PubMed ID: 12827844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 create a hole in ERISA preemption?
    Mueller KA
    Employee Relat Law J; 1996; 22(3):5-24. PubMed ID: 10163212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What is an employee benefit plan?: ERISA preemption of "any willing provider" laws after Pegram.
    Goodyear J
    Columbia Law Rev; 2001 Jun; 101(5):1107-39. PubMed ID: 11942337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Supreme Court to review Kentucky 'any-willing-provider' law.
    Sfikas PM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Sep; 133(9):1281-2. PubMed ID: 12356260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. U.S. Supreme Court wades into ERISA one more time.
    Roeder KH; Rees JS
    GHA Today; 2004 Aug; 48(7):3, 9. PubMed ID: 15500273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.