These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. In situ versus reversed saphenous vein for femoropopliteal bypass: a prospective randomized study of 100 cases. Watelet J; Cheysson E; Poels D; Menard JF; Papion H; Saour N; Testart J Ann Vasc Surg; 1987 May; 1(4):441-52. PubMed ID: 3504357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revascularization of the lower limb through arterial bypass with "in-situ" saphenous vein. Pizarro IE; Ibañez F; Salas S; Cam A Int Angiol; 1991; 10(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 2071974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Long-term results of reversed venous femoro-popliteal bypass. Apropos of 151 cases]. Ribal JP; Glanddier G J Mal Vasc; 1985; 10(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 3981077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Popliteal artery aneurysms. Factors associated with thromboembolism and graft failure. Martelli E; Ippoliti A; Ventoruzzo G; De Vivo G; Ascoli Marchetti A; Pistolese GR Int Angiol; 2004 Mar; 23(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 15156131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Femoropopliteal bypass: in situ or reversed vein grafts? Ten-year results of a randomized prospective study. Watelet J; Soury P; Menard JF; Plissonnier D; Peillon C; Lestrat JP; Testart J Ann Vasc Surg; 1997 Sep; 11(5):510-9. PubMed ID: 9302064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of graft type on patency of infrainguinal arterial bypass grafts. Neale ML; Graham JC; Lane RJ; Cheung DS; Appleberg M J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 8173726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Femoropopliteal in situ saphenous vein bypass: technical aspects and factors determining patency. Becquemin JP; Haiduc F; Labastie J; Mellière D Ann Vasc Surg; 1987 May; 1(4):432-40. PubMed ID: 3504356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [17 years experience with saphenous vein in situ bypass]. Gruss JD; Hiemer W Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1992; ():460-1. PubMed ID: 1493305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of reversed and in situ saphenous vein grafts for infragenicular bypass: experience of two surgeons. Sasajima T; Kubo Y; Kokubo M; Izumi Y; Inaba M Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 1(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 8075994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In situ saphenous vein grafts for femorodistal bypass: evaluation of endoscopically monitored valvulotomy on graft patency. Woelfle KD; Bruijnen H; Zuegel N; Mayer H; Hudde M; Loeprecht H Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Dec; 1(6):690-4. PubMed ID: 8076124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Role of postoperative anticoagulant treatment following femoro-popliteal venous bypass. Interim evaluation of a controlled clinical study]. Kretschmer G; Wenzl E; Huk I; Polterauer P; Ehringer H; Minar E; Schemper M Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1987 Sep; 99(17):591-5. PubMed ID: 2445114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preservation for future use of the autologous saphenous vein during femoro-popliteal bypass surgery is inexpedient. Dirven M; Scharn DM; Blankensteijn JD; van der Vliet JA Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Oct; 36(4):420-3. PubMed ID: 18675557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The myth of the in situ graft: superiority in infrainguinal bypass surgery? Lawson JA; Tangelder MJ; Algra A; Eikelboom BC Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1999 Aug; 18(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 10428752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]