BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1876964)

  • 1. [Critical evaluation of femoro-popliteal-crural in situ venous bypass--experiments on valve elimination and hemodynamics].
    Rendl KH
    Vasa Suppl; 1991; 31():1-48. PubMed ID: 1876964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Long-term patency of reversed and in situ femoro-popliteal bypasses].
    Marković DM; Davidović LB; Lotina SI; Kostić DM; Cinara IS; Svetković SD; Marković M; Zivanović N
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1999; 127(11-12):365-70. PubMed ID: 10686817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Factors which affect long-term patency in femoro-popliteal bypass].
    Marković DM; Davidović LB; Lotina SI; Kostić DM; Colić M; Pejkić SU; Jakovljević NS; Djorić P
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2000; 128(1-2):17-23. PubMed ID: 10916459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Factors determining late patency of aortobifemoral bypass graft].
    Davidović LB; Lotina SI; Kostić DM; Cinara II; Cvetković SD; Stojanov PL; Velimirović DB; Marković MM; Pejkić SA; Vukotić AM
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1997; 125(1-2):24-35. PubMed ID: 17974352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Femoro-crural in situ bypass].
    Lorentzen JE; Schroeder T; Aabech J; Sørensen S
    Chirurg; 1989 Apr; 60(4):283-6. PubMed ID: 2721305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Orthograde, free, femoro-popliteo-crural, venous bypass].
    Böhmig HJ; Polterauer P; Euler-Rolle J
    Chirurg; 1977 Oct; 48(10):671-4. PubMed ID: 913181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In situ versus reversed saphenous vein for femoropopliteal bypass: a prospective randomized study of 100 cases.
    Watelet J; Cheysson E; Poels D; Menard JF; Papion H; Saour N; Testart J
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1987 May; 1(4):441-52. PubMed ID: 3504357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revascularization of the lower limb through arterial bypass with "in-situ" saphenous vein.
    Pizarro IE; Ibañez F; Salas S; Cam A
    Int Angiol; 1991; 10(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 2071974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Long-term results of reversed venous femoro-popliteal bypass. Apropos of 151 cases].
    Ribal JP; Glanddier G
    J Mal Vasc; 1985; 10(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 3981077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Popliteal artery aneurysms. Factors associated with thromboembolism and graft failure.
    Martelli E; Ippoliti A; Ventoruzzo G; De Vivo G; Ascoli Marchetti A; Pistolese GR
    Int Angiol; 2004 Mar; 23(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 15156131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoropopliteal bypass: in situ or reversed vein grafts? Ten-year results of a randomized prospective study.
    Watelet J; Soury P; Menard JF; Plissonnier D; Peillon C; Lestrat JP; Testart J
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1997 Sep; 11(5):510-9. PubMed ID: 9302064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of graft type on patency of infrainguinal arterial bypass grafts.
    Neale ML; Graham JC; Lane RJ; Cheung DS; Appleberg M
    J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 8173726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Femoropopliteal in situ saphenous vein bypass: technical aspects and factors determining patency.
    Becquemin JP; Haiduc F; Labastie J; Mellière D
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1987 May; 1(4):432-40. PubMed ID: 3504356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [17 years experience with saphenous vein in situ bypass].
    Gruss JD; Hiemer W
    Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1992; ():460-1. PubMed ID: 1493305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of reversed and in situ saphenous vein grafts for infragenicular bypass: experience of two surgeons.
    Sasajima T; Kubo Y; Kokubo M; Izumi Y; Inaba M
    Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 1(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 8075994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In situ saphenous vein grafts for femorodistal bypass: evaluation of endoscopically monitored valvulotomy on graft patency.
    Woelfle KD; Bruijnen H; Zuegel N; Mayer H; Hudde M; Loeprecht H
    Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Dec; 1(6):690-4. PubMed ID: 8076124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Role of postoperative anticoagulant treatment following femoro-popliteal venous bypass. Interim evaluation of a controlled clinical study].
    Kretschmer G; Wenzl E; Huk I; Polterauer P; Ehringer H; Minar E; Schemper M
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1987 Sep; 99(17):591-5. PubMed ID: 2445114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preservation for future use of the autologous saphenous vein during femoro-popliteal bypass surgery is inexpedient.
    Dirven M; Scharn DM; Blankensteijn JD; van der Vliet JA
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Oct; 36(4):420-3. PubMed ID: 18675557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The myth of the in situ graft: superiority in infrainguinal bypass surgery?
    Lawson JA; Tangelder MJ; Algra A; Eikelboom BC
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1999 Aug; 18(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 10428752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal outcome after tibial arterial bypass.
    Shah DM; Paty PS; Leather RP; Chang BB; Darling RC; Feustel PJ
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Sep; 177(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 8356500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.