These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18769968)

  • 1. Application of QC_DR software for acceptance testing and routine quality control of direct digital radiography systems: initial experiences using the Italian Association of Physicist in Medicine quality control protocol.
    Nitrosi A; Bertolini M; Borasi G; Botti A; Barani A; Rivetti S; Pierotti L
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Dec; 22(6):656-66. PubMed ID: 18769968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems.
    Gray L; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; O'Connor U; Devine M; Larkin A; Walsh C; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):276-8. PubMed ID: 18326885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG
    Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection
    Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital radiography image quality: image processing and display.
    Krupinski EA; Williams MB; Andriole K; Strauss KJ; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA; ; ;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):389-400. PubMed ID: 17544140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition.
    Williams MB; Krupinski EA; Strauss KJ; Breeden WK; Rzeszotarski MS; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):371-88. PubMed ID: 17544139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of digital image quality indexes for CIRS SP01 and CDMAM 3.4 mammographic phantoms.
    Mayo P; Rodenas F; Verdú G; Campayo JM; Villaescusa JI
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():418-21. PubMed ID: 19162682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Management of pediatric radiation dose using Philips digital radiography.
    Neitzel U
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S227-33; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems: first experiences within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme.
    Thierens H; Bosmans H; Buls N; Bacher K; De Hauwere A; Jacobs J; Clerinx P
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 17696080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Description and implementation of a quality control program in an imaging-based clinical trial.
    Cagnon CH; Cody DD; McNitt-Gray MF; Seibert JA; Judy PF; Aberle DR
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1431-41. PubMed ID: 17111584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
    Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of computed radiography for routine linear accelerator and simulator quality control.
    Patel I; Natarajan T; Hassan SS; Kirby MC
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 82(982):827-38. PubMed ID: 19398464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimization of image quality and dose for Varian aS500 electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs).
    McGarry CK; Grattan MW; Cosgrove VP
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6865-77. PubMed ID: 18029980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Doses under automatic exposure control (AEC) for direct digital radiographic (DDR) X-ray systems.
    Bowden L; Faulkner R; Clancy C; Gallagher A; Devine M; Gorman D; O'Reilly G; Dowling A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):210-4. PubMed ID: 21937592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The characteristics of digital electron optical systems for x-ray diagnosis].
    Blinov NN; Kozlovskiĭ EB; Luzin SI; Pervov AIu; Sonin AF; Plutov IG; Rodin VI
    Med Tekh; 1999; (5):24-6. PubMed ID: 10560092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ongoing quality control in digital radiography: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 151.
    Jones AK; Heintz P; Geiser W; Goldman L; Jerjian K; Martin M; Peck D; Pfeiffer D; Ranger N; Yorkston J
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6658-70. PubMed ID: 26520756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Management of pediatric radiation dose using Canon digital radiography.
    Arreola M; Rill L
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S221-6; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality control of storage phosphor digital radiography systems.
    Freedman M; Steller D; Jafroudi H; Mun SK
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 May; 8(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 7612704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.