278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18770519)
21. The power of independent types of genetic information to detect association in a case-control study design.
Won S; Elston RC
Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 32(8):731-56. PubMed ID: 18481783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Nonparametric disequilibrium mapping of functional sites using haplotypes of multiple tightly linked single-nucleotide polymorphism markers.
Cheng R; Ma JZ; Wright FA; Lin S; Gao X; Wang D; Elston RC; Li MD
Genetics; 2003 Jul; 164(3):1175-87. PubMed ID: 12871923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Testing association between disease and multiple SNPs in a candidate gene.
Gauderman WJ; Murcray C; Gilliland F; Conti DV
Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Jul; 31(5):383-95. PubMed ID: 17410554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accounting for haplotype uncertainty in matched association studies: a comparison of simple and flexible techniques.
Kraft P; Cox DG; Paynter RA; Hunter D; De Vivo I
Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 28(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 15637718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Investigation of the ability of haplotype association and logistic regression to identify associated susceptibility loci.
North BV; Sham PC; Knight J; Martin ER; Curtis D
Ann Hum Genet; 2006 Nov; 70(Pt 6):893-906. PubMed ID: 17044864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Susceptibility of biallelic haplotype and genotype frequencies to genotyping error.
Moskvina V; Schmidt KM
Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1116-23. PubMed ID: 17156286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Testing for genetic association: a powerful score test.
El Galta R; Stijnen T; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4596-609. PubMed ID: 18551534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Little loss of information due to unknown phase for fine-scale linkage-disequilibrium mapping with single-nucleotide-polymorphism genotype data.
Morris AP; Whittaker JC; Balding DJ
Am J Hum Genet; 2004 May; 74(5):945-53. PubMed ID: 15077198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Transmission/disequilibrium test based on haplotype sharing for tightly linked markers.
Zhang S; Sha Q; Chen HS; Dong J; Jiang R
Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Sep; 73(3):566-79. PubMed ID: 12929082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Contrasting linkage-disequilibrium patterns between cases and controls as a novel association-mapping method.
Zaykin DV; Meng Z; Ehm MG
Am J Hum Genet; 2006 May; 78(5):737-746. PubMed ID: 16642430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantifying bias due to allele misclassification in case-control studies of haplotypes.
Govindarajulu US; Spiegelman D; Miller KL; Kraft P
Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 30(7):590-601. PubMed ID: 16830341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The relative power of SNPs and haplotype as genetic markers for association tests.
Bader JS
Pharmacogenomics; 2001 Feb; 2(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 11258193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An E-M algorithm and testing strategy for multiple-locus haplotypes.
Long JC; Williams RC; Urbanek M
Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Mar; 56(3):799-810. PubMed ID: 7887436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Estimating haplotype frequencies and standard errors for multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Li SS; Khalid N; Carlson C; Zhao LP
Biostatistics; 2003 Oct; 4(4):513-22. PubMed ID: 14557108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A new association test to test multiple-marker association.
Wang X; Zhang S; Sha Q
Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 18720476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Linkage disequilibrium testing when linkage phase is unknown.
Schaid DJ
Genetics; 2004 Jan; 166(1):505-12. PubMed ID: 15020439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bayesian haplotype inference for multiple linked single-nucleotide polymorphisms.
Niu T; Qin ZS; Xu X; Liu JS
Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Jan; 70(1):157-69. PubMed ID: 11741196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies.
de Bakker PI; Yelensky R; Pe'er I; Gabriel SB; Daly MJ; Altshuler D
Nat Genet; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1217-23. PubMed ID: 16244653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Single-marker and two-marker association tests for unphased case-control genotype data, with a power comparison.
Kim S; Morris NJ; Won S; Elston RC
Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 34(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 19557751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
