These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18771678)

  • 1. Structural and view-specific representations for the categorization of three-dimensional objects.
    Rentschler I; Gschwind M; Brettel H; Osman E; Caelli T
    Vision Res; 2008 Nov; 48(25):2501-8. PubMed ID: 18771678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects.
    Cooke T; Jäkel F; Wallraven C; Bülthoff HH
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):484-95. PubMed ID: 16580027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A developmental dissociation of view-dependent and view-invariant object recognition in adolescence.
    Jüttner M; Müller A; Rentschler I
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 175(2):420-4. PubMed ID: 17055074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Invariant object recognition in the visual system with novel views of 3D objects.
    Stringer SM; Rolls ET
    Neural Comput; 2002 Nov; 14(11):2585-96. PubMed ID: 12433291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast- and illumination-invariant object recognition from active sensation.
    Rentschler I; Osman E; Jüttner M
    Spat Vis; 2009; 22(5):383-96. PubMed ID: 19814902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. View combination in moving objects: the role of motion in discriminating between novel views of similar and distinctive objects by humans and pigeons.
    Friedman A; Vuong QC; Spetch ML
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(6):594-607. PubMed ID: 19232366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Representations of familiar and unfamiliar faces as revealed by viewpoint-aftereffects.
    Ryu JJ; Chaudhuri A
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(23):4059-63. PubMed ID: 16996559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial vs temporal continuity in view invariant visual object recognition learning.
    Perry G; Rolls ET; Stringer SM
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(23):3994-4006. PubMed ID: 16996556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The interaction of shape- and location-based priming in object categorisation: evidence for a hybrid "what + where" representation stage.
    Newell FN; Sheppard DM; Edelman S; Shapiro KL
    Vision Res; 2005 Jul; 45(16):2065-80. PubMed ID: 15845239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recognition invariance obtained by extended and invariant features.
    Ullman S; Bart E
    Neural Netw; 2004; 17(5-6):833-48. PubMed ID: 15288901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Roles of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations in locomotion and reorientation.
    Mou W; McNamara TP; Rump B; Xiao C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1274-90. PubMed ID: 17087583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. View-invariant object category learning, recognition, and search: how spatial and object attention are coordinated using surface-based attentional shrouds.
    Fazl A; Grossberg S; Mingolla E
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Feb; 58(1):1-48. PubMed ID: 18653176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implicit encoding of extrinsic object properties in stored representations mediating recognition: evidence from shadow-specific repetition priming.
    Leek EC; Davitt LI; Cristino F
    Vision Res; 2015 Mar; 108():49-55. PubMed ID: 25637853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Qualitative differences in the representation of spatial relations for different object classes.
    Cooper EE; Brooks BE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Apr; 30(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 15053686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Representing 3D virtual objects: interaction between visuo-spatial ability and type of exploration.
    Meijer F; van den Broek EL
    Vision Res; 2010 Mar; 50(6):630-5. PubMed ID: 20116394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Object discrimination in pigeons: effects of local and global cues.
    Lazareva OF; Vecera SP; Wasserman EA
    Vision Res; 2006 Apr; 46(8-9):1361-74. PubMed ID: 16364395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inverting houses and textures: investigating the characteristics of learned inversion effects.
    Husk JS; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    Vision Res; 2007 Dec; 47(27):3350-9. PubMed ID: 17988706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stored representations of three-dimensional objects in the absence of two-dimensional cues.
    Phinney RE; Siegel RM
    Perception; 1999; 28(6):725-37. PubMed ID: 10664767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Category-specificity in visual object recognition.
    Gerlach C
    Cognition; 2009 Jun; 111(3):281-301. PubMed ID: 19324331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The structure of three-dimensional object representations in human vision: evidence from whole-part matching.
    Leek EC; Reppa I; Arguin M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Aug; 31(4):668-84. PubMed ID: 16131241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.