These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18771694)

  • 21. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
    Gräbel S; Hirschfelder A; Scheiber C; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spatial and temporal effects of interleaved masking in cochlear implants.
    Kwon BJ; van den Honert C
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 10(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 19495879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Frequency tuning curves derived from auditory steady state evoked potentials: a proof-of-concept study.
    Markessis E; Poncelet L; Colin C; Coppens A; Hoonhorst I; Kadhim H; Deltenre P
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 19125026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electro-acoustic stimulation. Acoustic and electric pitch comparisons.
    McDermott H; Sucher C; Simpson A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():2-7. PubMed ID: 19390169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An introduction to the biophysics of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Rubinstein JT
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S3-9. PubMed ID: 15732375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: parametric data from the cat.
    Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Nov; 88(5):2205-10. PubMed ID: 2269736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of temporal properties on compound action potentials in response to amplitude-modulated electric pulse trains in guinea pigs.
    Jeng FC; Abbas PJ; Hu N; Miller CA; Nourski KV; Robinson BK
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 19015019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):143-56. PubMed ID: 15953524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An objective method to measure electrode independence in cochlear implant patients with a dual-masker forward masking technique.
    Klop WM; Frijns JH; Soede W; Briaire JJ
    Hear Res; 2009 Jul; 253(1-2):3-14. PubMed ID: 19306921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Relation between derived-band auditory brainstem response latencies and behavioral frequency selectivity.
    Strelcyk O; Christoforidis D; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Oct; 126(4):1878-88. PubMed ID: 19813802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dose-dependent suppression of the electrically elicited stapedius reflex by general anesthetics in children undergoing cochlear implant surgery.
    Crawford MW; White MC; Propst EJ; Zaarour C; Cushing S; Pehora C; James AL; Gordon KA; Papsin BC
    Anesth Analg; 2009 May; 108(5):1480-7. PubMed ID: 19372325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How much residual hearing is 'useful' for music perception with cochlear implants?
    El Fata F; James CJ; Laborde ML; Fraysse B
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():14-21. PubMed ID: 19390171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Refractoriness of sural nerve in humans.
    Stevens P; Bawa P
    Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 2008 Sep; 86(9):600-5. PubMed ID: 18758508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS; Chang PS; Simpson BD; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current.
    Cohen LT
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19063956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in adults and children: effects of lateral to medial placement of the nucleus 24 contour electrode array.
    Runge-Samuelson C; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Wackym PA
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 19300297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The clinical application of potentials evoked from the peripheral auditory system.
    Miller CA; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Chi SL
    Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 242(1-2):184-97. PubMed ID: 18515023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
    Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of two frequency-to-electrode maps for acoustic-electric stimulation.
    Simpson A; McDermott HJ; Dowell RC; Sucher C; Briggs RJ
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Feb; 48(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 19219690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Auditory steady-state responses to bone conduction stimuli in children with hearing loss.
    Swanepoel de W; Ebrahim S; Friedland P; Swanepoel A; Pottas L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 72(12):1861-71. PubMed ID: 18963045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.