These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18771990)

  • 1. The impact of duration of labor induction on cesarean rate.
    Michelson KA; Carr DB; Easterling TR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):299.e1-4. PubMed ID: 18771990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Infertility treatment is an independent risk factor for cesarean section among nulliparous women aged 40 and above.
    Sheiner E; Shoham-Vardi I; Hershkovitz R; Katz M; Mazor M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):888-92. PubMed ID: 11641672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of labor induction on cesarean section rates in diabetic pregnancies.
    Levy AL; Gonzalez JL; Rappaport VJ; Curet LB; Rayburn WF
    J Reprod Med; 2002 Nov; 47(11):931-2. PubMed ID: 12497683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The association between the length of first stage of labor, mode of delivery, and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor.
    Cheng YW; Delaney SS; Hopkins LM; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 201(5):477.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19608153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emergency cesarean delivery in induction of labor: an evaluation of risk factors.
    Cnattingius R; Höglund B; Kieler H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 May; 84(5):456-62. PubMed ID: 15842210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immediate neonatal outcomes after elective induction of labor.
    Beebe L; Beaty C; Rayburn W
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Mar; 52(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 17465284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.
    Glantz JC
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 15916205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maternal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by obesity.
    Robinson HE; O'Connell CM; Joseph KS; McLeod NL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Dec; 106(6):1357-64. PubMed ID: 16319263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor.
    Peregrine E; O'Brien P; Omar R; Jauniaux E
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):227-33. PubMed ID: 16449105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk factors for cesarean delivery in preterm, term and post-term patients undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
    Ennen CS; Bofill JA; Magann EF; Bass JD; Chauhan SP; Morrison JC
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2009; 67(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 18971583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction.
    Nuthalapaty FS; Rouse DJ; Owen J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 14990405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age.
    Caughey AB; Nicholson JM; Cheng YW; Lyell DJ; Washington AE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):700-5. PubMed ID: 16949399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery.
    Landon MB; Leindecker S; Spong CY; Hauth JC; Bloom S; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman AM; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM; Gabbe SG;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1016-23. PubMed ID: 16157104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perinatal outcomes in low-risk term pregnancies: do they differ by week of gestation?
    Cheng YW; Nicholson JM; Nakagawa S; Bruckner TA; Washington AE; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):370.e1-7. PubMed ID: 18928977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of obstetric intervention on trends in twin stillbirths: United States, 1989-99.
    Ananth CV; Joseph KS; Kinzler WL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):380-7. PubMed ID: 15280109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preeclampsia: is induction of labor more successful?
    Xenakis EM; Piper JM; Field N; Conway D; Langer O
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):600-3. PubMed ID: 9083320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Induction of labor with prostaglandins for medical reasons: determining explanatory variables of the induction to delivery time interval for vaginal deliveries and caesarean section.
    Braems G; Norhausen I
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Dec; 135(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 17240033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Cheng YW; Hopkins LM; Laros RK; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 196(6):585.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17547906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Continuity of nursing care and its link to cesarean birth rate.
    Gagnon AJ; Meier KM; Waghorn K
    Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 17324175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.