BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18772429)

  • 21. Quantitative imaging of the Dorsal nuclear gradient reveals limitations to threshold-dependent patterning in Drosophila.
    Liberman LM; Reeves GT; Stathopoulos A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Dec; 106(52):22317-22. PubMed ID: 20018754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantitative-enhancer-FACS-seq (QeFS) reveals epistatic interactions among motifs within transcriptional enhancers in developing Drosophila tissue.
    Waters CT; Gisselbrecht SS; Sytnikova YA; Cafarelli TM; Hill DE; Bulyk ML
    Genome Biol; 2021 Dec; 22(1):348. PubMed ID: 34930411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Consequences of eukaryotic enhancer architecture for gene expression dynamics, development, and fitness.
    Ludwig MZ; Manu ; Kittler R; White KP; Kreitman M
    PLoS Genet; 2011 Nov; 7(11):e1002364. PubMed ID: 22102826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Enhancer architecture and chromatin accessibility constrain phenotypic space during Drosophila development.
    Galupa R; Alvarez-Canales G; Borst NO; Fuqua T; Gandara L; Misunou N; Richter K; Alves MRP; Karumbi E; Perkins ML; Kocijan T; Rushlow CA; Crocker J
    Dev Cell; 2023 Jan; 58(1):51-62.e4. PubMed ID: 36626871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Soma-dependent modulations contribute to divergence of rhomboid expression during evolution of Drosophila eggshell morphology.
    Nakamura Y; Kagesawa T; Nishikawa M; Hayashi Y; Kobayashi S; Niimi T; Matsuno K
    Development; 2007 Apr; 134(8):1529-37. PubMed ID: 17360774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A synthetic biology approach to the development of transcriptional regulatory models and custom enhancer design.
    Martinez CA; Barr KA; Kim AR; Reinitz J
    Methods; 2013 Jul; 62(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 23732772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Functional conservation of Rel binding sites in drosophilid genomes.
    Copley RR; Totrov M; Linnell J; Field S; Ragoussis J; Udalova IA
    Genome Res; 2007 Sep; 17(9):1327-35. PubMed ID: 17785540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Genome-Wide Ultrabithorax Binding Analysis Reveals Highly Targeted Genomic Loci at Developmental Regulators and a Potential Connection to Polycomb-Mediated Regulation.
    Shlyueva D; Meireles-Filho AC; Pagani M; Stark A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161997. PubMed ID: 27575958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computational models for neurogenic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo.
    Zinzen RP; Senger K; Levine M; Papatsenko D
    Curr Biol; 2006 Jul; 16(13):1358-65. PubMed ID: 16750631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evolution of insect dorsoventral patterning mechanisms.
    Perry MW; Cande JD; Boettiger AN; Levine M
    Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 2009; 74():275-9. PubMed ID: 19843594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evolutionary plasticity of polycomb/trithorax response elements in Drosophila species.
    Hauenschild A; Ringrose L; Altmutter C; Paro R; Rehmsmeier M
    PLoS Biol; 2008 Oct; 6(10):e261. PubMed ID: 18959483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dynamic reprogramming of chromatin accessibility during Drosophila embryo development.
    Thomas S; Li XY; Sabo PJ; Sandstrom R; Thurman RE; Canfield TK; Giste E; Fisher W; Hammonds A; Celniker SE; Biggin MD; Stamatoyannopoulos JA
    Genome Biol; 2011; 12(5):R43. PubMed ID: 21569360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Synthetic enhancer design by in silico compensatory evolution reveals flexibility and constraint in cis-regulation.
    Barr KA; Martinez C; Moran JR; Kim AR; Ramos AF; Reinitz J
    BMC Syst Biol; 2017 Nov; 11(1):116. PubMed ID: 29187214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Chromosomal distribution of PcG proteins during Drosophila development.
    Nègre N; Hennetin J; Sun LV; Lavrov S; Bellis M; White KP; Cavalli G
    PLoS Biol; 2006 Jun; 4(6):e170. PubMed ID: 16613483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Gene regulation: boundaries within limits.
    Payankaulam S; Arnosti DN
    Curr Biol; 2008 Aug; 18(15):R653-R655. PubMed ID: 18682204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Related target enhancers for dorsal and NF-kappa B signaling pathways.
    González-Crespo S; Levine M
    Science; 1994 Apr; 264(5156):255-8. PubMed ID: 8146656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The short gastrulation shadow enhancer employs dual modes of transcriptional synergy.
    Shin DH; Hong JW
    Int J Dev Biol; 2017; 61(1-2):73-80. PubMed ID: 27528040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Different modes of enhancer-specific regulation by Runt and Even-skipped during
    Hang S; Gergen JP
    Mol Biol Cell; 2017 Mar; 28(5):681-691. PubMed ID: 28077616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. HOT DNAs: a novel class of developmental enhancers.
    Farley E; Levine M
    Genes Dev; 2012 May; 26(9):873-6. PubMed ID: 22549952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A feed-forward relay integrates the regulatory activities of Bicoid and Orthodenticle via sequential binding to suboptimal sites.
    Datta RR; Ling J; Kurland J; Ren X; Xu Z; Yucel G; Moore J; Shokri L; Baker I; Bishop T; Struffi P; Levina R; Bulyk ML; Johnston RJ; Small S
    Genes Dev; 2018 May; 32(9-10):723-736. PubMed ID: 29764918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.