These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18772805)

  • 1. [How to follow-up women with dense breasts by imaging?].
    Tardivon A
    J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 89(9 Pt 2):1204-8. PubMed ID: 18772805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance imaging and breast ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammographic screening in high-risk patients.
    Le-Petross HT; Shetty MK
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 21782116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.
    Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.
    Pisano ED; Gatsonis C; Hendrick E; Yaffe M; Baum JK; Acharyya S; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Bassett L; D'Orsi C; Jong R; Rebner M;
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Oct; 353(17):1773-83. PubMed ID: 16169887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined screening with mammography and ultrasound in a population-based screening program.
    Buchberger W; Geiger-Gritsch S; Knapp R; Gautsch K; Oberaigner W
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():24-29. PubMed ID: 29571797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing tumor extent on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus full-field digital mammography and ultrasound.
    Patel BK; Garza SA; Eversman S; Lopez-Alvarez Y; Kosiorek H; Pockaj BA
    Clin Imaging; 2017; 46():78-84. PubMed ID: 28750354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
    Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program.
    Séradour B; Heid P; Estève J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jan; 202(1):229-36. PubMed ID: 24370149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
    Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening.
    Haas BM; Kalra V; Geisel J; Raghu M; Durand M; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23901124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound: Additional roles in dense breasts with category 0 at conventional digital mammography.
    Lee WK; Chung J; Cha ES; Lee JE; Kim JH
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):291-296. PubMed ID: 26499000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved Performance of Adjunctive Ultrasonography After Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer Among Chinese Females.
    Dong H; Huang Y; Song F; Dai H; Liu P; Zhu Y; Wang P; Han J; Hao X; Chen K
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Jun; 18(3):e353-e361. PubMed ID: 28887010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program.
    Wilczek B; Wilczek HE; Rasouliyan L; Leifland K
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1554-63. PubMed ID: 27501888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancer screening.
    Freimanis RI; Yacobozzi M
    N C Med J; 2014; 75(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 24663133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.
    Nelson HD; Pappas M; Cantor A; Griffin J; Daeges M; Humphrey L
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):256-67. PubMed ID: 26756737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Focal Breast Pain: Does Breast Density Affect the Need for Ultrasound?
    Cho MW; Grimm LJ; Johnson KS
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 27746121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tailored supplemental screening for breast cancer: what now and what next?
    Berg WA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):390-9. PubMed ID: 19155400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
    Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.