BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18773155)

  • 1. [Rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms. The role of computational mechanics].
    Giannoglou G; Giannakoulas G; Hatzitolios AI; Rudolf J
    Herz; 2008 Jul; 33(5):354-61. PubMed ID: 18773155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model.
    Rissland P; Alemu Y; Einav S; Ricotta J; Bluestein D
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Mar; 131(3):031001. PubMed ID: 19154060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical determinants of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture.
    Vorp DA; Vande Geest JP
    Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol; 2005 Aug; 25(8):1558-66. PubMed ID: 16055757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A biomechanics-based rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm risk assessment: demonstrative application.
    Vande Geest JP; Di Martino ES; Bohra A; Makaroun MS; Vorp DA
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Nov; 1085():11-21. PubMed ID: 17182918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advancements in identifying biomechanical determinants for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture.
    Kontopodis N; Metaxa E; Papaharilaou Y; Tavlas E; Tsetis D; Ioannou C
    Vascular; 2015 Feb; 23(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 24757027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of wall calcifications in patient-specific wall stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Speelman L; Bohra A; Bosboom EM; Schurink GW; van de Vosse FN; Makaorun MS; Vorp DA
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 17227104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue.
    Di Martino ES; Bohra A; Vande Geest JP; Gupta N; Makaroun MS; Vorp DA
    J Vasc Surg; 2006 Mar; 43(3):570-6; discussion 576. PubMed ID: 16520175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of blood flow and vessel geometry on wall stress and rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Li Z; Kleinstreuer C
    J Med Eng Technol; 2006; 30(5):283-97. PubMed ID: 16980283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computational evaluation of aortic aneurysm rupture risk: what have we learned so far?
    Georgakarakos E; Ioannou CV; Papaharilaou Y; Kostas T; Katsamouris AN
    J Endovasc Ther; 2011 Apr; 18(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 21521062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A decoupled fluid structure approach for estimating wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Papaharilaou Y; Ekaterinaris JA; Manousaki E; Katsamouris AN
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(2):367-77. PubMed ID: 16500664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Raghavan ML; Vorp DA; Federle MP; Makaroun MS; Webster MW
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Apr; 31(4):760-9. PubMed ID: 10753284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical stresses in abdominal aortic aneurysms: influence of diameter, asymmetry, and material anisotropy.
    Rodríguez JF; Ruiz C; Doblaré M; Holzapfel GA
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021023. PubMed ID: 18412510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of diameter, wall stress, and rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction.
    Maier A; Gee MW; Reeps C; Pongratz J; Eckstein HH; Wall WA
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Oct; 38(10):3124-34. PubMed ID: 20480238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A patient-specific computational model of fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Wolters BJ; Rutten MC; Schurink GW; Kose U; de Hart J; van de Vosse FN
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Dec; 27(10):871-83. PubMed ID: 16157501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Raghavan ML; Kratzberg J; Castro de Tolosa EM; Hanaoka MM; Walker P; da Silva ES
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(16):3010-6. PubMed ID: 16337949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of biomechanical failure criteria for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Volokh KY
    J Biomech; 2010 Jul; 43(10):2032-4. PubMed ID: 20381050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors promoting rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Van Damme H; Sakalihasan N; Limet R
    Acta Chir Belg; 2005 Feb; 105(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15790196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis and computer program for rupture-risk prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Kleinstreuer C; Li Z
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Mar; 5():19. PubMed ID: 16529648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness.
    Scotti CM; Shkolnik AD; Muluk SC; Finol EA
    Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Nov; 4():64. PubMed ID: 16271141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intraluminal thrombus and risk of rupture in patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysm - FSI modelling.
    Bluestein D; Dumont K; De Beule M; Ricotta J; Impellizzeri P; Verhegghe B; Verdonck P
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2009 Feb; 12(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 18651282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.