240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18773467)
1. The effects of total hip arthroplasty on the structural and biomechanical properties of adult bone.
Peck JJ; Stout SD
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 Feb; 138(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 18773467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in femur stress after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: response to physiological loads.
Little JP; Taddei F; Viceconti M; Murray DW; Gill HS
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):440-8. PubMed ID: 17257719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Alterations in femoral strain following hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.
Deuel CR; Jamali AA; Stover SM; Hazelwood SJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jan; 91(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19092017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reduced bone stress as predicted by composite beam theory correlates with cortical bone loss following cemented total hip arthroplasty.
Silva MJ; Reed KL; Robertson DD; Bragdon C; Harris WH; Maloney WJ
J Orthop Res; 1999 Jul; 17(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 10459758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Biomechanical influences after implantation of a total hip endoprosthesis on the periprosthetic bone density around the cup].
Layher F; Babisch J; Roth A
Z Orthop Unfall; 2007; 145(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 17492555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodelling after implantation of anatomic and straight stem prostheses in total hip arthroplasty.
Grochola LF; Habermann B; Mastrodomenico N; Kurth A
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Apr; 128(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 18038142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relation between subject-specific hip joint loading, stress distribution in the proximal femur and bone mineral density changes after total hip replacement.
Jonkers I; Sauwen N; Lenaerts G; Mulier M; Van der Perre G; Jaecques S
J Biomech; 2008 Dec; 41(16):3405-13. PubMed ID: 19019372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sex-specific developmental changes in muscle size and bone geometry at the femoral shaft.
Högler W; Blimkie CJ; Cowell CT; Inglis D; Rauch F; Kemp AF; Wiebe P; Duncan CS; Farpour-Lambert N; Woodhead HJ
Bone; 2008 May; 42(5):982-9. PubMed ID: 18337201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone mineral density and singh index predict bone mechanical properties of human femur.
D'Amelio P; Rossi P; Isaia G; Lollino N; Castoldi F; Girardo M; Dettoni F; Sattin F; Delise M; Bignardi C
Connect Tissue Res; 2008; 49(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 18382896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Natural factors that affect the shape and strength of the aging human femur.
Poss R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):194-201. PubMed ID: 1729003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differential effects of bone structural and material properties on bone competence in C57BL/6 and C3H/He inbred strains of mice.
Voide R; van Lenthe GH; Müller R
Calcif Tissue Int; 2008 Jul; 83(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 18545865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of newly designed stemless prosthesis and conventional hip prosthesis--an experimental study.
Tai CL; Lee MS; Chen WP; Hsieh PH; Lee PC; Shih CH
Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 15912004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Geometric and material contributions to whole bone structural behavior in GDF-7-deficient mice.
Maloul A; Rossmeier K; Mikic B; Pogue V; Battaglia T
Connect Tissue Res; 2006; 47(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 16753809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Migration and cyclic motion of a new short-stemmed hip prosthesis--a biomechanical in vitro study.
Westphal FM; Bishop N; Honl M; Hille E; Püschel K; Morlock MM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Oct; 21(8):834-40. PubMed ID: 16806616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurement and accuracy of bone mineral after unilateral total hip arthroplasty.
Bloebaum RD; Liau DW; Lester DK; Rosenbaum TG
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jun; 21(4):612-22. PubMed ID: 16781417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A quantitative assessment of cross-sectional cortical bone remodeling in the femoral diaphysis following hip arthroplasty in elderly females.
Torchia ME; Ruff CB
J Orthop Res; 1990 Nov; 8(6):883-91. PubMed ID: 2213345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone remodeling characteristics of a short-stemmed total hip replacement.
Chen HH; Morrey BF; An KN; Luo ZP
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):945-50. PubMed ID: 18848420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone loss during simulated weightlessness: a biomechanical and mineralization study in the rat model.
Garber MA; McDowell DL; Hutton WC
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2000 Jun; 71(6):586-92. PubMed ID: 10870817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
