These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18773588)

  • 1. Measuring blood pressure using an automated sphygmomanometer.
    Wedgbury K; Valler-Jones T
    Br J Nurs; 2008 Jun12-25; 17(11):714-8. PubMed ID: 18773588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring blood pressure using the mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Valler-Jones T; Wedgbury K
    Br J Nurs; 2005 Feb 10-23; 14(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 15788933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
    Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Demise of the mercury sphygmomanometer and the dawning of a new era in blood pressure measurement.
    O'Brien E
    Blood Press Monit; 2003 Feb; 8(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 12604931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blood pressure measuring devices: ubiquitous, essential but imprecise.
    de Greeff A; Shennan A
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2008 Sep; 5(5):573-9. PubMed ID: 18803468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Has conventional sphygmomanometry ended with the banning of mercury?
    O'Brien E
    Blood Press Monit; 2002 Feb; 7(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 12040241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The mercury sphygmomanometer should be abandoned before it is proscribed.
    Markandu ND; Whitcher F; Arnold A; Carney C
    J Hum Hypertens; 2000 Jan; 14(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 10673728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of sphygmomanometers at pharmacies.
    Erdem DG; Erdem E; Dilek M; Aydogdu T; Selim N; Demiray F; Sari A; Akpolat T
    Kidney Blood Press Res; 2009; 32(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 19622898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can electronic sphygmomanometers be used for measurement of blood pressure at high altitudes?
    Li S; Zhao X; Ba S; He F; Lam CT; Ke L; Li N; Yan LL; Li X; Wu Y
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Apr; 17(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 22343751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Consistency between the electronic and mercury sphygmomanometer in children and adolescents on blood pressure measuring].
    Cao Q; Li D; Yu W; Guo Q; Zhao L; Yu D; Wang Y
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2016 Sep; 45(5):758-765. PubMed ID: 29903127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How accurate are automated blood pressure monitors?
    Beales D
    Br J Community Nurs; 2005 Jul; 10(7):334-8. PubMed ID: 16010236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New clinical validation method for automated sphygmomanometer: a proposal by Japan ISO-WG for sphygmomanometer standard.
    Shirasaki O; Asou Y; Takahashi Y
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Dec; 12(6):381-3. PubMed ID: 18277315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are aneroid sphygmomanometers accurate in hospital and clinic settings?
    Canzanello VJ; Jensen PL; Schwartz GL
    Arch Intern Med; 2001 Mar; 161(5):729-31. PubMed ID: 11231706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alternatives to the mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Buchanan S; Orris P; Karliner J
    J Public Health Policy; 2011 Feb; 32(1):107-20. PubMed ID: 21109765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey.
    Myers MG; McInnis NH; Fodor GJ; Leenen FH
    Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 18219304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.
    Farsky S; Benova K; Krausova D; Sirotiaková J; Vysocanova P
    Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):252-7. PubMed ID: 21914986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of automated blood pressure measurements in clinical trials and registration studies: data from the VALTOP Study.
    Mengden T; Asmar R; Kandra A; Di Giovanni R; Brudi P; Parati G
    Blood Press Monit; 2010 Aug; 15(4):188-94. PubMed ID: 20543666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated blood pressure measurement in routine clinical practice.
    Myers MG
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 16534406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.