105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18773728)
1. Covert detection of attractiveness among the neurologically intact: evidence from skin-conductance responses.
McDonald PR; Slater AM; Longmore CA
Perception; 2008; 37(7):1054-60. PubMed ID: 18773728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Face recognition and emotional valence: processing without awareness by neurologically intact participants does not simulate covert recognition in prosopagnosia.
Stone A; Valentine T; Davis R
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2001 Jun; 1(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 12467113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Covert recognition relies on affective valence in developmental prosopagnosia: evidence from the skin conductance response.
Bate S; Cook SJ
Neuropsychology; 2012 Sep; 26(5):670-4. PubMed ID: 22823135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Covert face recognition without prosopagnosia.
Ellis HD; Young AW; Koenken G
Behav Neurol; 1993; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 24487927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 'What is more familiar than I? Self, other and familiarity in schizophrenia.
Ameller A; Dereux A; Dubertret C; Vaiva G; Thomas P; Pins D
Schizophr Res; 2015 Feb; 161(2-3):501-5. PubMed ID: 25533594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dissociation between verbal and autonomic measures of memory following frontal lobe damage.
Rapcsak SZ; Kaszniak AW; Reminger SL; Glisky ML; Glisky EL; Comer JF
Neurology; 1998 May; 50(5):1259-65. PubMed ID: 9595972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Familiarity breeds attraction: effects of exposure on the attractiveness of typical and distinctive faces.
Peskin M; Newell FN
Perception; 2004; 33(2):147-57. PubMed ID: 15109158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrophysiological markers of covert face recognition in developmental prosopagnosia.
Eimer M; Gosling A; Duchaine B
Brain; 2012 Feb; 135(Pt 2):542-54. PubMed ID: 22271660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The movement advantage in famous and unfamiliar faces: a comparison of point-light displays and shape-normalised avatar stimuli.
Bennetts RJ; Kim J; Burke D; Brooks KR; Lucey S; Saragih J; Robbins RA
Perception; 2013; 42(9):950-70. PubMed ID: 24386715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What's special about personally familiar faces? A multimodal approach.
Herzmann G; Schweinberger SR; Sommer W; Jentzsch I
Psychophysiology; 2004 Sep; 41(5):688-701. PubMed ID: 15318875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Double Dissociation between Overt and Covert Face Recognition.
Tranel D; Damasio H; Damasio AR
J Cogn Neurosci; 1995; 7(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 23961902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterizing the spatio-temporal dynamics of the neural events occurring prior to and up to overt recognition of famous faces.
Jemel B; Schuller AM; Goffaux V
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2289-305. PubMed ID: 19642891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Beauty beyond compare: effects of context extremity and categorization on hedonic contrast.
Cogan E; Parker S; Zellner DA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 23244047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of familiarity on face adaptation.
Laurence S; Hole G
Perception; 2011; 40(4):450-63. PubMed ID: 21805920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Affective processing of loved faces: contributions from peripheral and central electrophysiology.
Vico C; Guerra P; Robles H; Vila J; Anllo-Vento L
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):2894-902. PubMed ID: 20678982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preadolescents' recognition of faces of unfamiliar peers: the effect of attractiveness of faces.
Mallet P; Lallemand N
J Genet Psychol; 2003 Dec; 164(4):453-71. PubMed ID: 14719778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Strength of visual percept generated by famous faces perceived without awareness: effects of affective valence, response latency, and visual field.
Stone A; Valentine T
Conscious Cogn; 2005 Sep; 14(3):548-64. PubMed ID: 16091270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Covert face recognition relies on affective valence in congenital prosopagnosia.
Bate S; Haslam C; Jansari A; Hodgson TL
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2009 Jun; 26(4):391-411. PubMed ID: 19693716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distinct neural correlates of the preference-related valuation of supraliminally and subliminally presented faces.
Ito A; Abe N; Kawachi Y; Kawasaki I; Ueno A; Yoshida K; Sakai S; Matsue Y; Fujii T
Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Aug; 36(8):2865-77. PubMed ID: 25880023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrophysiological correlates of processing facial attractiveness and its influence on cooperative behavior.
Chen J; Zhong J; Zhang Y; Li P; Zhang A; Tan Q; Li H
Neurosci Lett; 2012 May; 517(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 22410307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
