647 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18773913)
1. Thermal taste, PROP responsiveness, and perception of oral sensations.
Bajec MR; Pickering GJ
Physiol Behav; 2008 Nov; 95(4):581-90. PubMed ID: 18773913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chemesthesis and taste: evidence of independent processing of sensation intensity.
Green BG; Alvarez-Reeves M; George P; Akirav C
Physiol Behav; 2005 Nov; 86(4):526-37. PubMed ID: 16199067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relation between PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) taster status, taste anatomy and dietary intake measures for young men and women.
Yackinous CA; Guinard JX
Appetite; 2002 Jun; 38(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 12071686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human hedonic responses to sweetness: role of taste genetics and anatomy.
Yeomans MR; Tepper BJ; Rietzschel J; Prescott J
Physiol Behav; 2007 Jun; 91(2-3):264-73. PubMed ID: 17477942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An automated method to detect and quantify fungiform papillae in the human tongue: Validation and relationship to phenotypical differences in taste perception.
Eldeghaidy S; Thomas D; Skinner M; Ford R; Giesbrecht T; Thomas A; Hort J; Francis S
Physiol Behav; 2018 Feb; 184():226-234. PubMed ID: 29223711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 'Thermal taste' predicts higher responsiveness to chemical taste and flavor.
Green BG; George P
Chem Senses; 2004 Sep; 29(7):617-28. PubMed ID: 15337686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PROP taster status and self-perceived food adventurousness influence food preferences.
Ullrich NV; Touger-Decker R; O'sullivan-Maillet J; Tepper BJ
J Am Diet Assoc; 2004 Apr; 104(4):543-9. PubMed ID: 15054337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Food acceptance and genetic variation in taste.
Duffy VB; Bartoshuk LM
J Am Diet Assoc; 2000 Jun; 100(6):647-55. PubMed ID: 10863567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Associations between taste genetics, oral sensation and alcohol intake.
Duffy VB; Peterson JM; Bartoshuk LM
Physiol Behav; 2004 Sep; 82(2-3):435-45. PubMed ID: 15276808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revisiting sugar-fat mixtures: sweetness and creaminess vary with phenotypic markers of oral sensation.
Hayes JE; Duffy VB
Chem Senses; 2007 Mar; 32(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 17204520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Individual Variation in PROP Status, Fungiform Papillae Density, and Responsiveness to Taste Stimuli in a Large Population Sample.
Dinnella C; Monteleone E; Piochi M; Spinelli S; Prescott J; Pierguidi L; Gasperi F; Laureati M; Pagliarini E; Predieri S; Torri L; Barbieri S; Valli E; Bianchi P; Braghieri A; Caro AD; Di Monaco R; Favotto S; Moneta E
Chem Senses; 2018 Nov; 43(9):697-710. PubMed ID: 30204849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Supertasting and PROP bitterness depends on more than the TAS2R38 gene.
Hayes JE; Bartoshuk LM; Kidd JR; Duffy VB
Chem Senses; 2008 Mar; 33(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 18209019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Supertaster, super reactive: oral sensitivity for bitter taste modulates emotional approach and avoidance behavior in the affective startle paradigm.
Herbert C; Platte P; Wiemer J; Macht M; Blumenthal TD
Physiol Behav; 2014 Aug; 135():198-207. PubMed ID: 24912136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic variation in taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil and its relationship to taste perception and food selection.
Tepper BJ; White EA; Koelliker Y; Lanzara C; d'Adamo P; Gasparini P
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jul; 1170():126-39. PubMed ID: 19686122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variation in thermally induced taste response across thermal tasters.
Skinner M; Eldeghaidy S; Ford R; Giesbrecht T; Thomas A; Francis S; Hort J
Physiol Behav; 2018 May; 188():67-78. PubMed ID: 29410235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Individual differences in prefrontal cortex activity during perception of bitter taste using fNIRS methodology.
Bembich S; Lanzara C; Clarici A; Demarini S; Tepper BJ; Gasparini P; Grasso DL
Chem Senses; 2010 Nov; 35(9):801-12. PubMed ID: 20801896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relationship between phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taster status and taste thresholds for sucrose and quinine.
Chang WI; Chung JW; Kim YK; Chung SC; Kho HS
Arch Oral Biol; 2006 May; 51(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 16297856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of individual variations in taste sensitivity on coffee perceptions and preferences.
Masi C; Dinnella C; Monteleone E; Prescott J
Physiol Behav; 2015 Jan; 138():219-26. PubMed ID: 25446205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Individual differences in oral thermosensation.
Manrique S; Zald DH
Physiol Behav; 2006 Jul; 88(4-5):417-24. PubMed ID: 16733061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrophysiological Responses from the Human Tongue to the Six Taste Qualities and Their Relationships with PROP Taster Status.
Melis M; Sollai G; Mastinu M; Pani D; Cosseddu P; Bonfiglio A; Crnjar R; Tepper BJ; Barbarossa IT
Nutrients; 2020 Jul; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 32645975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
