BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

648 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18774032)

  • 1. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
    Mesrur Halefoglu A
    Semin Roentgenol; 2008 Oct; 43(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 18774032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for suspected bilio-pancreatic disease: should the endoscopist take a second look?
    Wehrmann T; Eckardt AJ; Riphaus A
    Z Gastroenterol; 2013 Feb; 51(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 23417365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Quality rating of MR-cholangiopancreatography with oral application of iron oxide particles].
    Lorenzen M; Wedegärtner U; Fiehler J; Adam G
    Rofo; 2003 Jul; 175(7):936-41. PubMed ID: 12847648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [MRCP (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography)--an assessment of current status].
    Merkle EM; Nüssle K; Glasbrenner B; Tomczak R; Preclik G; Rieber A; Adler G; Brambs HJ
    Z Gastroenterol; 1998 Mar; 36(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 9577905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Malignant biliary obstruction: value of imaging findings.
    Stroszczynski C; Hunerbein M
    Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(3):314-23. PubMed ID: 15965779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The usefulness of MRCP in the initial diagnosis of the biliary and pancreatic diseases compared with ERCP].
    Iwano M; Mukai H; Mizuma Y; Takino T; Ashihara T; Ueda T; Matumura S; Fujita T; Takano Y; Fujiwara H; Watanabe A; Masuzawa A
    Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2880-4. PubMed ID: 9847614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Obscure bile duct stenosis: diagnostic management].
    Riemann JF; Damian U; Weickert U
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Sep; 129 Suppl 2():S133-4. PubMed ID: 15368193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases].
    Albert J; Adamek HE; Weitz M; Breer M; Riemann JF
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1998 Sep; 123(39):1149-55. PubMed ID: 9793019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Value of ultrasound and retrograde pancreatocholangiography in the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases].
    Poleo JR
    G E N; 1981; 35(1-2):29-42. PubMed ID: 6816660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-invasive evaluation of the biliary tree with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: initial clinical experience.
    Pavone P; Laghi A; Catalano C; Broglia L; Fiocca F; Passariello R
    Ital J Gastroenterol; 1996; 28(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 8781996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical aspects and diagnostic approach in biliary tract and pancreatic disease (author's transl)].
    Gyr K
    Ther Umsch; 1977 Dec; 34(12):847-54. PubMed ID: 594921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography Still Plays a Role in the Preoperative Evaluation of Choledocholithiasis and Biliary Pathology.
    Kanaan Z; Antaki F
    J Am Coll Surg; 2016 Mar; 222(3):325-6. PubMed ID: 26922606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Re-evaluation of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as a diagnostic method.
    Salmon PR
    Clin Gastroenterol; 1978 Sep; 7(3):651-66. PubMed ID: 361307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Shimizu S; Kutsumi H; Fujimoto S; Kawai K
    Endoscopy; 1998 Feb; 30(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 9592657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Value of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice.
    Engelbrecht M; Rauws E; Besselink M
    J Am Coll Surg; 2016 Mar; 222(3):328. PubMed ID: 26922608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Ultrasonics and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Correlation in biliopancreatic pathology].
    de Dios Vega JF; Miño Fugarolas G; Rodríguez Vives A; Guerrero Giménez P; Gómez Camacho F; Robles Olid J
    Rev Esp Enferm Apar Dig; 1982 Jul; 62(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 7134598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abandoning Hasty Conclusions: The Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice.
    Parthasarathy M; Maqsood H; Sill AM; Kowdley GC; Cunningham SC
    J Am Coll Surg; 2016 Mar; 222(3):326-8. PubMed ID: 26922607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): diagnostic usefulness].
    Pamos S; Rivera P; Canelles P; Quiles F; Ortí E; Cuquerella J; Martínez V; Medina E
    Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1998 Apr; 21(4):174-80. PubMed ID: 9633177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography.
    Reinhold C; Bret PM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1285-95. PubMed ID: 8633434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnostic evaluation of autoimmune pancreatitis.
    Park SH; Kim MH; Kim SY; Kim HJ; Moon SH; Lee SS; Byun JH; Lee SK; Seo DW; Lee MG
    Pancreas; 2010 Nov; 39(8):1191-8. PubMed ID: 20467343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.