350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18774402)
1. The role and responsibilities of coauthors.
Lancet; 2008 Sep; 372(9641):778. PubMed ID: 18774402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE
J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
Couzin J; Unger K
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles".
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Wager E; Barbour V; Yentis S; Kleinert S;
Obes Rev; 2010 Jan; 11(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 20653849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Retractions' realities.
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Retraction ends furore over cancer vaccine.
Abbott A
Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6953):4. PubMed ID: 12955102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Authorship in scholarly scientific publication.
Habal MB
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1059-60. PubMed ID: 23851737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving the integrity of published science: An expanded taxonomy of retractions and corrections.
Fanelli D; Ioannidis JPA; Goodman S
Eur J Clin Invest; 2018 Apr; 48(4):. PubMed ID: 29369337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Writing for publication: avoiding common ethical pitfalls.
Siedlecki SL; Montague M; Schultz J
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 18344788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The 'truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth...'.
Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(6):281-2. PubMed ID: 19041445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Spoof research paper is accepted by 157 journals.
Hawkes N
BMJ; 2013 Oct; 347():f5975. PubMed ID: 24096966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Publication dilemmas.
Hughes G
Emerg Med J; 2007 Sep; 24(9):610. PubMed ID: 17711931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer-Review Fraud--Hacking the Scientific Publication Process.
Haug CJ
N Engl J Med; 2015 Dec; 373(25):2393-5. PubMed ID: 26488392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct.
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 56(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 19330396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Publication ethics: its importance to readers, authors, and the profession.
Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C
J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs; 2012 Feb; 25(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22299799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Publication ethics: Its importance to readers, authors, and the profession.
Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C
J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2012 Jan; 24(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22243674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Integrity in publishing: update on policies and statements on authorship, duplicate publications, and conflict of interest.
Yoshikawa TT; Ouslander JG
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2007 Feb; 55(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 17302649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Ethical implications of authorship. Rights and responsibilities of authors of biomedical articles].
Galende I; Escortell E;
Med Clin (Barc); 2009 Sep; 133(10):379-80. PubMed ID: 19524989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
