These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1877449)

  • 1. Single- versus dual-chamber sensor-driven pacing: comparison of cardiac outputs.
    Proctor EE; Leman RB; Mann DL; Kaiser J; Kratz J; Gillette P
    Am Heart J; 1991 Sep; 122(3 Pt 1):728-32. PubMed ID: 1877449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers.
    Rediker DE; Eagle KA; Homma S; Gillam LD; Harthorne JW
    Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 3341209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays.
    Ovsyshcher I; Zimlichman R; Katz A; Bondy C; Furman S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 21(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 8436759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Importance of heart rate response during exercise in patients using atrioventricular synchronous and ventricular pacemakers.
    McMeekin JD; Lautner D; Hanson S; Gulamhusein SS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Jan; 13(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 1689036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Haemodynamic advantage with single chamber rate responsive pacemakers over dual chamber pacemakers during exercise in chronotropic incompetence.
    Maity AK; Ghosh SP; Dasbiswas A; Chatterjee SS; Chaudhury D; Das MK
    Indian Heart J; 1992; 44(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 1289220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Superior cardiac hemodynamics of atrioventricular synchrony over rate responsive pacing at submaximal exercise: observations in activity sensing DDDR pacemakers.
    Lau CP; Wong CK; Leung WH; Liu WX
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1832-7. PubMed ID: 1704550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
    Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
    Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of four rate-responsive pacing modes.
    Sulke N; Chambers J; Dritsas A; Sowton E
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Mar; 17(3):696-706. PubMed ID: 1993790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing on ventilatory response to exercise in patients with complete AV block.
    Tani M; Fujiki A; Asanoi H; Yoshida S; Tsuji H; Mizumaki K; Sasayama S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Oct; 15(10 Pt 1):1482-91. PubMed ID: 1383960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Left ventricular performance at rest and during exercise in patients with dual-chamber pacemakers.
    Kano K; Okada M; Tanahashi Y; Hayashi H; Yokota M; Saito H; Sotobata I
    Intern Med; 1992 Jan; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1568027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of rate modulated dual chamber and VVIR pacing.
    Jutzy RV; Florio J; Isaeff DM; Marsa RJ; Bansal RC; Jutzy KR; Levine PA; Feenstra L
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1838-46. PubMed ID: 1704551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
    Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N
    Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the early hemodynamic changes in carotid arteries during ventricular and dual chamber pacing.
    Soylu M; Ozdemir O; Geyik B; Ozbakir C; Demir AD; Duru E; Ozbal S; Hekimoglu B; Ozer T; Arda K
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Nov; 27(11):1540-4. PubMed ID: 15546310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study.
    Vardas PE; Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Skalidis EI; Zuridakis EG
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cardiovascular responses during static exercise. Studies in patients with complete heart block and dual chamber pacemakers.
    Alexander T; Friedman DB; Levine BD; Pawelczyk JA; Mitchell JH
    Circulation; 1994 Apr; 89(4):1643-7. PubMed ID: 8149531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost benefit analysis of single and dual chamber pacing for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. An economic sensitivity analysis of the literature.
    Sutton R; Bourgeois I
    Eur Heart J; 1996 Apr; 17(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8733091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dual chamber pacing: how many patients remain in DDD mode over the long term?
    Ibrahim B; Sanderson JE; Wright B; Palmer R
    Br Heart J; 1995 Jul; 74(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 7662461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of dual chamber and ventricular rate responsive pacing in patients over 75 with complete heart block.
    Hargreaves MR; Channon KM; Cripps TR; Gardner M; Ormerod OJ
    Br Heart J; 1995 Oct; 74(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 7488454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Atrial arrhythmia management with sensor controlled atrial refractory period and automatic mode switching in patients with minute ventilation sensing dual chamber rate adaptive pacemakers.
    Lau CP; Tai YT; Fong PC; Li JP; Chung FL
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Oct; 15(10 Pt 1):1504-14. PubMed ID: 1383962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of low rate dual chamber pacing to activity responsive rate variable ventricular pacing.
    Batey RL; Sweesy MW; Scala G; Forney RC
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 May; 13(5):646-52. PubMed ID: 1693204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.